[Spud] SPUD and anycast... ?!
Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com> Fri, 14 August 2015 07:04 UTC
Return-Path: <eckert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7747E1A007A
for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.618
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.618 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, PLING_QUERY=0.994, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5]
autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id JcE1lFb9bBtL for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BE441A0074
for <spud@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;
d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=501; q=dns/txt; s=iport;
t=1439535854; x=1440745454;
h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version;
bh=BHp3hJ1zfGLveXjhb9JiN4OvgZ2UuPRYb42q2XVvVH4=;
b=h58dASZpTozPACg1tXthPUkdSrPNYlotf38WU5FV6ma8EONhub4u09EM
F339v2RN2fAFajtIABSs0dMb6/F/ijPDkr8tIDtrgNzymrQQE8k+NPs0K
VKkZK9rPVhddCINWnrT2r0/xqdo2WE25NBZZRlg/3MqpCe7s/CSAbrPKc o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ACBgAQks1V/5BdJa1dgxu/PwEJiSgMOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEZHs0BYkKqiOmFQsBAQEekHqEFQWNT4dMjGkDmiQmhB0egn8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,676,1432598400"; d="scan'208";a="20432786"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144])
by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Aug 2015 07:04:13 +0000
Received: from mcast-linux1.cisco.com (mcast-linux1.cisco.com [172.27.244.121])
by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t7E74CWT009023
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <spud@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 07:04:12 GMT
Received: from mcast-linux1.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1])
by mcast-linux1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t7E74BTT005602
for <spud@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:04:11 -0700
Received: (from eckert@localhost)
by mcast-linux1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id t7E74Bqr005601
for spud@ietf.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:04:11 -0700
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:04:11 -0700
From: Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>
To: spud@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150814070411.GQ1667@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spud/v8F4SfhyPWICNzheioXZHsKNByk>
Subject: [Spud] SPUD and anycast... ?!
X-BeenThere: spud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Protocol Underneath Datagrams <spud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spud>,
<mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spud/>
List-Post: <mailto:spud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud>,
<mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 07:04:14 -0000
Was there ever an extension for TCP or SCTP to "explicitly" deal with
anycast, eg: SYN to reponder anycast, SYN-ACK back from responder
unicast, but with data field indicating anycast address and nonce from
SYN, then ACK back to responder unicast ?
I can't remember / find anything like this right now. WOuld be
lovely for SPUD to consier including something like this. Heck,
could even do this with multicast and let initiator send ACK
back to fastest responder ;-)
Cheers
Toerless
- [Spud] SPUD and anycast... ?! Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] SPUD and anycast... ?! Michael Tuexen
- Re: [Spud] SPUD and anycast... ?! Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] SPUD and anycast... ?! Michael Tuexen
- Re: [Spud] SPUD and anycast... ?! Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] SPUD and anycast... ?! Michael Thornburgh
- Re: [Spud] SPUD and anycast... ?! Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] SPUD and anycast... ?! Michael Thornburgh