IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Spud] PCP vs. SPUD

Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com> Thu, 26 March 2015 19:07 UTC

Return-Path: <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903891A9300 for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 12:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1jFCZ4aBnD_l for <spud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 12:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22e.google.com (mail-ie0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB4EB1A923C for <spud@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 12:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iedfl3 with SMTP id fl3so60962789ied.1 for <spud@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 12:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=X0X+1hr9Lrm7o5zZ/ve0gGU2QxGcCLJsuC6sHCPWyzo=; b=tatqLASaNYap+OLPiMmlcigXq1mjhsVIoOMiz8jtgSSc4mG/Xe0DDdDVrYnryFi0By VhA4cPvibGYMA6fpPmPKyn8t0z7I1jDdXZhe0Ula8ON1xOyejHpEJD9+VFT9V+VXNjSg nkJrieqb706QWl2/Q69eNUwagwZuDU9XkiQ3AcnOjB6wVXzp9hqXD9Np9QXx/M/ycZKN rk2ng1q7zpcxKPB2qo9pFF7dxGqkNtHj+WvIVQ+9D0eLKel+rvD3UxNumeeFxJ/FPSuO N80aUb9V/wzS905NMxk5fErBaHSiH+8Ga6/AE1o55c+Cq6KqjKtufsiRvTIr6fsNnEyQ YaZg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.14.141 with SMTP id 135mr23405395ioo.15.1427396858409; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 12:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.113.196 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 12:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5513F563.50702@cisco.com>
References: <CAD62q9XopDJ7PFA9Hz7R2nV6OcwhQA=T=oGwQAN2_0EFPZvwzg@mail.gmail.com> <5513F563.50702@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:07:38 -0500
Message-ID: <CAD62q9WjVFtDrd6ja_2bzOZX1Sa6-Fc=JpdOi+d1gkNyQ1Cn0Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fefc2b2f88a051235ba57
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spud/xkXiebkr__Gy7LQZkOOxmyBG59M>
Cc: "spud@ietf.org" <spud@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Spud] PCP vs. SPUD
X-BeenThere: spud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Protocol Underneath Datagrams <spud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spud/>
List-Post: <mailto:spud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud>, <mailto:spud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 19:07:51 -0000

HI Eliot-

I don't understand your response.  Could you expand on it a little?  Are
you saying they both solve the problem but SPUD is more efficient?

--aaron

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:

>  Aaron,
>
> I view this stuff differently.  It's not whether an extra protocol can do
> the job, but whether there can be another implicit contract built, at least
> in the case of directionality.  That could be a tradeoff between signaling
> delay and packet overhead, but we don't yet really know what that packet
> overhead looks like.  If this is all DTLS then maybe apps want to eat that
> anyway.
>
> Eliot
>
>
> On 3/25/15 4:38 PM, Aaron Falk wrote:
>
> If we take SPUD's goals at their most minimal, as expressed by Ted, of
> enabling passage of encrypted traffic through middleboxes, can someone
> explain why PCP is not sufficient?
>
>  --aaron
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spud mailing listSpud@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spud
>
>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email