[Srcomp] 答复: About the drafts of the design team

Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> Wed, 20 January 2021 10:12 UTC

Return-Path: <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A833A0FCC for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 02:12:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Al_yFV8hR6Hc for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 02:12:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta2.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B5E3A0FBD for <srcomp@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 02:12:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.5]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app06-12006 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee660080203b38-900c2; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:12:23 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee660080203b38-900c2
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmcc (unknown[10.2.50.166]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr03-12003 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee3600802053b9-b9555; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:12:22 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee3600802053b9-b9555
From: Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
To: xiechf@chinatelecom.cn, 'srcomp' <srcomp@ietf.org>
References: <2021012009564266613329@chinatelecom.cn>
In-Reply-To: <2021012009564266613329@chinatelecom.cn>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:12:25 +0800
Message-ID: <04ad01d6ef14$c02f2d70$408d8850$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_04AE_01D6EF57.CE526D70"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Adbuz455LkprCKKvT6CH0ul6x+hCkAARRJwg
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/srcomp/YxixFbbwVWdgGCnbpXioERkRxH0>
Subject: [Srcomp] 答复: About the drafts of the design team
X-BeenThere: srcomp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <srcomp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/>
List-Post: <mailto:srcomp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 10:12:39 -0000

Thanks, Chongfeng.

We can talk about it at today’s meeting.

 

B.R.

Weiqiang Cheng

 

发件人: Srcomp [mailto:srcomp-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
发送时间: 2021年1月20日 09:57
收件人: srcomp
主题: [Srcomp] About the drafts of the design team

 

 

 

Hello, folks,

The drafts of requirements and analysis have been made by the design team,
everyone has made efforts and provided input during the last half year, so I
propose that the author list of the drafts should include all the members if
possible.  I think the output of team-work will be easier to be accepted by
the WG than that with a single author. 

In addition, based on the principle of impartial,  the first author of each
draft should be the memebr who gave the most contribution to this draft
technically, for the same principle, the first author of the two drafts
should not be the same member.  

We all konw that RFC have a 5-authors limit, If the drafts of the design
team are accepted as RFCs finally, the authors list can adjusted within DT
to meet this requirement. 

 

Best regards

 

Chongfeng

 

 

  _____  

xiechf@chinatelecom.cn