Re: [Srcomp] Draft Minutes Jan 20 2021

"xiechf@chinatelecom.cn" <xiechf@chinatelecom.cn> Thu, 21 January 2021 13:00 UTC

HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.92:39152.560068160
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-114.250.172.186?logid-6848745fc5384197ae982ea77a865ae9 (unknown [172.18.0.92]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id 35F1528007B; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 20:59:51 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: 66040161@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from ([172.18.0.92]) by App0021 with ESMTP id 6848745fc5384197ae982ea77a865ae9 for ddukes=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org; Thu Jan 21 20:59:54 2021
X-Transaction-ID: 6848745fc5384197ae982ea77a865ae9
X-filter-score: filter<0>
X-Real-From: xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.92
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Sender: xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 20:59:50 +0800
From: "xiechf@chinatelecom.cn" <xiechf@chinatelecom.cn>
To: "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, srcomp <srcomp@ietf.org>
References: <BN6PR11MB40816283D26CEAA000594E19C8A19@BN6PR11MB4081.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.18.111[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <202101212059491786443@chinatelecom.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart775245180147_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/srcomp/cMzwBVoKY00UvEOp_6swNL44p1w>
Subject: Re: [Srcomp] Draft Minutes Jan 20 2021
X-BeenThere: srcomp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <srcomp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/>
List-Post: <mailto:srcomp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:00:09 -0000

I diagree that the author list of analysis doc will be the same with the requirement doc.

Chongfeng 

xiechf@chinatelecom.cn

From: Darren Dukes \(ddukes\)
Date: 2021-01-21 10:05
To: srcomp@ietf.org
Subject: [Srcomp] Draft Minutes Jan 20 2021
Attendees: Weiqiang, PSF, Cheng Li, Wim, Darren, Ron, Chongfeng

Minutes
Add members to requirements author list in the order they appear in contributor list.
Analysis doc will be same
Added Compression Levels text to next revision (Add “able to support” to text)
Security requirement
Delete “Security Requirements” from Backlog they are already handled in the draft.
Operational requirements
Not discussed, need closure
Resurrecting BCP or PS statement (previously posted) with this proposed text:
Description: The compression mechanism SHOULD not violate any proposed standard or BCP. If it does violate any PS or BCP it MUST update the related document.
Rationale: Violation of existing standards makes the internet more fragile.
Metric: A solution that does not violate PS or BCP, or updates PS or BCP satisfies this requirement.
ACTION: Finalize text on the mailing list and conclude next week.
Candidate proposals
ACTION: Team to send proposals to srcomp – include the drafts or RFCs for analysis.

[Srcomp] Draft Minutes Jan 20 2021 Darren Dukes (ddukes)
Re: [Srcomp] Draft Minutes Jan 20 2021 xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
Re: [Srcomp] Draft Minutes Jan 20 2021 Chengli (Cheng Li)
Re: [Srcomp] Draft Minutes Jan 20 2021 Ron Bonica
Re: [Srcomp] Draft Minutes Jan 20 2021 Ron Bonica
Re: [Srcomp] Draft Minutes Jan 20 2021 程伟强
Re: [Srcomp] Draft Minutes Jan 20 2021 Ron Bonica
[Srcomp] 答复: Draft Minutes Jan 20 2021 Weiqiang Cheng
Re: [Srcomp] Draft Minutes Jan 20 2021 Darren Dukes (ddukes)
Re: [Srcomp] Draft Minutes Jan 20 2021 xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
Re: [Srcomp] Draft Minutes Jan 20 2021 Weiqiang Cheng
Re: [Srcomp] Draft Minutes Jan 20 2021 Chengli (Cheng Li)