Re: [Srcomp] 2020-09-30 Minutes for DT meeting

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Wed, 30 September 2020 16:48 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3733A0BC6 for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 09:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C8cBFOIhHvWX for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 09:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [83.247.10.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 288B93A0B95 for <srcomp@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 09:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71504B; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:48:36 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:in-reply-to:references:message-id:date:date:subject :subject:mime-version:from:from:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:received:received; s=mail; t= 1601484515; bh=AKC+9WAhGeFbY1nbq5kACQmcQ7Kifahxe93FAntHaIY=; b=Z onv8az5P/KDvVh9DdalqZgYDLRQyGCr3jjvS2yEjqTuCGXEQeL8G9GUGtTjVjMyg 08AtEWxvZvvyHVXElrod/rgmAoC1FuK+OT54h98DoU1C8Utp8lLTeG1WouQnV4r+ iIjMGcwxPh6RNpO/4LBYZCd1PA+p05v85nYzlK3ynY=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id P-2gTjq7-efj; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:48:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:4577:c2f6:8078:7077] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:4577:c2f6:8078:7077]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 056C949; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:48:34 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:48:34 +0200
Message-Id: <B8248059-E80A-419D-B532-5A6951A1006D@steffann.nl>
References: <DM6PR05MB63480B029674D239BA761736AE330@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: srcomp@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR05MB63480B029674D239BA761736AE330@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18A393)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/srcomp/lEWuOag8H-gUUakwfSFZPElWm20>
Subject: Re: [Srcomp] 2020-09-30 Minutes for DT meeting
X-BeenThere: srcomp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <srcomp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/>
List-Post: <mailto:srcomp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 16:48:42 -0000

Hi Ron,

> Didn't we agree to add an umbrella statement to saying:
> 
> - We don't know how any of these metrics will impact packets per second forwarded on a particular ASIC
> - Impact will vary from ASIC to ASIC

You are correct. I minuted:

> - D.PRS: Add text noting that impact is implementation dependent

But this is not only for D.PRS. It should indeed be an umbrella statement.

Cheers,
Sander