RE: [ssm] Re: last call comments on ssm-arch doc
"Rolland Vida" <Rolland.Vida@lip6.fr> Wed, 15 January 2003 16:13 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA01546 for <ssm-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:13:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0FGSIJ22115; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:28:18 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0FGLgJ21810 for <ssm@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:21:42 -0500
Received: from isis.lip6.fr (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA01238 for <ssm@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:06:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tibre.lip6.fr (tibre.lip6.fr [132.227.74.2]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.12.4/jtpda-5.4+victor) with ESMTP id h0FG8kmT012506 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) ; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:08:46 +0100
X-pt: isis.lip6.fr
Received: from otos (otos [132.227.61.47]) by tibre.lip6.fr (8.11.6/8.11.3) with SMTP id h0FG8k320015; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:08:46 +0100 (MET)
From: Rolland Vida <Rolland.Vida@lip6.fr>
To: Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>
Cc: ssm@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [ssm] Re: last call comments on ssm-arch doc
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:08:46 +0100
Message-ID: <NDBBLPHLPKFAHIKICCDPCEFMCMAA.Rolland.Vida@lip6.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <20030115155041.GF2103@cypher.cisco.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-Scanned-By: isis.lip6.fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ssm-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ssm-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ssm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ssm>, <mailto:ssm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Source-Specific Multicast <ssm.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ssm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ssm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ssm>, <mailto:ssm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Because in SSM the reflection is done at application level, so the > reflecting server can do a lot of useful stuff like source filtering > (access control), (re-)encoding/fec, (re-)encryption, filtering, > synchronization, buffering, shaping, adding coffee. It depends on the application. For some, I agree that this model can be useful. for a small size videoconference for example, you could mix all the voice flows together at the server, and send out only one voice stream on the SSM channel (for the video it's more complicated...) But in any case, I see it as a way to use SSM for doing something that is quite different from what SSM was originaly meant for. One basic feature of SSM is source filtering. In your model the server can only filter out malicious sources for example. But if two different receivers want to listen to two different "legal" sources, and do not want to listen to nobody else, your server can never support that on the same SSM channel. Regards, Rolland _______________________________________________ ssm mailing list ssm@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ssm
- [ssm] Re: last call comments on ssm-arch doc Hugh Holbrook
- Re: [ssm] Re: last call comments on ssm-arch doc Hitoshi Asaeda
- RE: [ssm] Re: last call comments on ssm-arch doc Rolland Vida
- Re: [ssm] Re: last call comments on ssm-arch doc Hitoshi Asaeda
- Re: [ssm] Re: last call comments on ssm-arch doc Toerless Eckert
- RE: [ssm] Re: last call comments on ssm-arch doc Rolland Vida
- Re: [ssm] Re: last call comments on ssm-arch doc Toerless Eckert
- RE: [ssm] Re: last call comments on ssm-arch doc Rolland Vida
- Re: [ssm] Re: last call comments on ssm-arch doc Toerless Eckert
- Re: [ssm] Re: last call comments on ssm-arch doc Pavlin Radoslavov
- RE: [ssm] Re: last call comments on ssm-arch doc Michael Luby
- Re: [ssm] Re: last call comments on ssm-arch doc Daniel Zappala
- Re: RE: [ssm] Re: last call comments on ssm-arch … Hugh Holbrook
- Re: Re: [ssm] Re: last call comments on ssm-arch … Hugh Holbrook
- Re: [ssm] Re: last call comments on ssm-arch doc Pavlin Radoslavov
- Re: Re: [ssm] Re: last call comments on ssm-arch … Hugh Holbrook
- [ssm] building multi-sender apps with ssm Hugh Holbrook
- Re: [ssm] building multi-sender apps with ssm Pavlin Radoslavov
- Re: Re: [ssm] building multi-sender apps with ssm Hugh Holbrook