Re: [ssm] Who uses SSM?

Beau Williamson <bwilliam@cisco.com> Wed, 17 November 2004 15:31 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA08714 for <ssm-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:31:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CURhn-0002YN-SD; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:26:47 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CURcT-0001Te-40 for ssm@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:21:17 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA07773 for <ssm@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:21:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CURet-0003ML-32 for ssm@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:23:48 -0500
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (171.71.177.238) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Nov 2004 07:35:54 -0800
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
Received: from edison.cisco.com (edison.cisco.com [171.71.180.109]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id iAHFKgPJ008786; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:20:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bwilliam-t30.cisco.com (rcdn-bwilliam-3002-2.cisco.com [10.89.26.27]) by edison.cisco.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/CISCO.SERVER.1.2) with ESMTP id HAA29692; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:20:41 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20041117091703.033fc290@edison.cisco.com>
X-Sender: bwilliam@edison.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:21:08 -0600
To: "Marc Barisch" <mbarisch@gmx.net>, ssm@ietf.org
From: Beau Williamson <bwilliam@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [ssm] Who uses SSM?
In-Reply-To: <22794.1100698216@www62.gmx.net>
References: <22794.1100698216@www62.gmx.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ea4ac80f790299f943f0a53be7e1a21a
X-BeenThere: ssm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Source-Specific Multicast <ssm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ssm>, <mailto:ssm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ssm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ssm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ssm>, <mailto:ssm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ssm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ssm-bounces@ietf.org

At 11/17/2004 07:30 AM, Marc Barisch wrote:
>Hi
>
>I have read about the advantages of PIM-SSM over PIM-SM from a technical
>point of view.
>For a seminar paper at my university, I would like to provide some figures
>concerning the deployment of the different PIM modes, especially regarding
>TV broadcast over packet networks.
>
>Does anybody know of providers using PIM-SSM or are using all PIM-SM?
>Are there any commercial deployments regarding PIM-SSM and IPv6.
>
>Thanks in advance
>
>Marc

Marc,

This is a classic case of "The spirit is willing but the flesh (hardware) 
is weak."

The advantages are certainly well known and there is a growing push to 
build networks that support SSM.  Unfortunately, the support for IGMPv3 is 
still not pervasive enough in end-stations and (in some cases) edge routers 
and switches to actually deploy SSM.  This is slowly changing and I expect 
(I hope) that we will soon see greater deployments of SSM for one-to-many 
multicast applications.

Beau Williamson 


_______________________________________________
ssm mailing list
ssm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ssm