Re: [ssm] msnip status

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Wed, 19 October 2005 16:41 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ESH0A-0002py-VG; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:41:18 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ESH07-0002ps-3r for ssm@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:41:15 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA27544 for <ssm@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:41:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pilot.jhuapl.edu ([128.244.198.200] helo=jhuapl.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESHBs-0000b2-Du for ssm@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:53:25 -0400
Received: from ([128.244.206.105]) by pilot.jhuapl.edu with ESMTP id KP-BRARG.6509219; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:40:32 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20051019124841.GL9025@storhaugen.uninett.no>
References: <20051019124841.GL9025@storhaugen.uninett.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623)
Message-Id: <ce8f3212bc8ba11a7739b4c9433e3a22@innovationslab.net>
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Subject: Re: [ssm] msnip status
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:40:30 -0400
To: Stig Venaas <Stig.Venaas@uninett.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 32b73d73e8047ed17386f9799119ce43
Cc: ssm mailing list <ssm@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ssm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Source-Specific Multicast <ssm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ssm>, <mailto:ssm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ssm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ssm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ssm>, <mailto:ssm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0479784884=="
Sender: ssm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ssm-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Stig,
      The consensus is that msnip is not the solution people want.
Additionally, there has been no one volunteering to work on the
problem in general.

      Combining MSNIP with MRD doesn't make a lot of sense
and any such plans were abandoned.

      If you have people interested in the problem, have them bring
forth ideas.

Regards,
Brian

On Oct 19, 2005, at 8:48, Stig Venaas wrote:

> Now that magma is being shut down, what is the future of
> draft-ietf-magma-msnip? I know several people that are
> interested in seeing this work continue. Are there any
> plans for that, or has it more or less been decided that
> this is not the way to go? I know there were discussions
> on combining it with MRD, but don't think that went
> anywhere.
>
> Stig
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ssm mailing list
> ssm@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ssm
_______________________________________________
ssm mailing list
ssm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ssm