Re: [ssm] msnip status
Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Wed, 19 October 2005 16:41 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ESH0A-0002py-VG; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:41:18 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ESH07-0002ps-3r for ssm@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:41:15 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA27544 for <ssm@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:41:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pilot.jhuapl.edu ([128.244.198.200] helo=jhuapl.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESHBs-0000b2-Du for ssm@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:53:25 -0400
Received: from ([128.244.206.105]) by pilot.jhuapl.edu with ESMTP id KP-BRARG.6509219; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:40:32 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20051019124841.GL9025@storhaugen.uninett.no>
References: <20051019124841.GL9025@storhaugen.uninett.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623)
Message-Id: <ce8f3212bc8ba11a7739b4c9433e3a22@innovationslab.net>
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Subject: Re: [ssm] msnip status
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:40:30 -0400
To: Stig Venaas <Stig.Venaas@uninett.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 32b73d73e8047ed17386f9799119ce43
Cc: ssm mailing list <ssm@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ssm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Source-Specific Multicast <ssm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ssm>, <mailto:ssm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ssm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ssm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ssm>, <mailto:ssm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0479784884=="
Sender: ssm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ssm-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Stig, The consensus is that msnip is not the solution people want. Additionally, there has been no one volunteering to work on the problem in general. Combining MSNIP with MRD doesn't make a lot of sense and any such plans were abandoned. If you have people interested in the problem, have them bring forth ideas. Regards, Brian On Oct 19, 2005, at 8:48, Stig Venaas wrote: > Now that magma is being shut down, what is the future of > draft-ietf-magma-msnip? I know several people that are > interested in seeing this work continue. Are there any > plans for that, or has it more or less been decided that > this is not the way to go? I know there were discussions > on combining it with MRD, but don't think that went > anywhere. > > Stig > > > _______________________________________________ > ssm mailing list > ssm@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ssm
_______________________________________________ ssm mailing list ssm@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ssm
- [ssm] msnip status Stig Venaas
- Re: [ssm] msnip status Brian Haberman
- Re: [ssm] msnip status Hugo Santos
- Re: [ssm] msnip status Pekka Savola
- Re: [ssm] msnip status Toerless Eckert
- Re: [ssm] msnip status Beau Williamson
- Re: [ssm] msnip status Isidor Kouvelas
- Re: [ssm] msnip status Pekka Savola
- Re: [ssm] msnip status Isidor Kouvelas
- Re: [ssm] msnip status hoerdt Mickael
- Re: [ssm] msnip status Matthias Waehlisch
- Re: [ssm] msnip status Brian Haberman