Re: [Stackevo-discuss] [5gangip] [gaia] 5G: It's the Network, Stupid

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Tue, 22 December 2015 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: stackevo-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stackevo-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E028F1A88F0; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 08:57:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UH1Z064zw0qk; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 08:57:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22e.google.com (mail-pf0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E6A41A888A; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 08:57:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id u7so62556326pfb.1; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 08:57:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ZpEKUUR5rc9/Mt/k85pscY5ttN8+XBgB8KQWpg/+Hag=; b=Oi0F9k12HuV1jFle9GPB+xVj4EpA9LB2XCe/Nrut/i4U4VoQsp+6P2mwqnXTx7qUMJ ugOKaB1F/9WgyjpiScAzqnFwf8xLKfytWr41o0VGJfj5bdXrSjcA2+C64WWE1Dqs1oV/ R9adzNjxN8+O7HKAk4PgbOxJoO/+XbBhFGl+gntDENkHiUxJLFVJOosev4lOlqqj6VDd GFXS6KYCNvjjsKbjCLEsslPvS8Y77aqr/XG+0SpkNrL9M99auviz1APX3q688cbxw03d +pJXEu6QfKl/CNWugWascMEwxRl5KDFjbkVXzoxBp3exr6nb9UCGkAv2r2yBAcW1gf57 2Hag==
X-Received: by 10.98.44.209 with SMTP id s200mr29035578pfs.2.1450803470919; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 08:57:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.197.31.157] (173-11-119-245-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [173.11.119.245]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h90sm6966060pfj.23.2015.12.22.08.57.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 22 Dec 2015 08:57:49 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <56789156.2020704@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 08:57:46 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6EE22057-5EB9-4489-A50D-7B92DA2B96AF@gmail.com>
References: <82AB329A76E2484D934BBCA77E9F5249A682F744@Hydra.office.hd> <CAEeTej+pHehyX7+qteogQcAkCcJKYhZoQKStuXGmAzWRj1_rXQ@mail.gmail.com> <F8355406-91C7-4B96-995C-1AD9D7997DC1@kcl.ac.uk> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F657DB3A7F@dfweml701-chm> <56789156.2020704@isi.edu>
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stackevo-discuss/NbigcMFw5po4I5iS2xrFCt2XI7Y>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 05:00:44 -0800
Cc: "icnrg@irtf.org" <icnrg@irtf.org>, gaia <gaia@irtf.org>, "stackevo-discuss@iab.org" <stackevo-discuss@iab.org>, Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>, Jon Crowcroft <jon.crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk>, "5gangip@ietf.org" <5gangip@ietf.org>, "marnew@iab.org" <marnew@iab.org>, Nishanth Sastry <nishanth.sastry@kcl.ac.uk>, Dirk Kutscher <Dirk.Kutscher@neclab.eu>, "dtn-interest@irtf.org" <dtn-interest@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Stackevo-discuss] [5gangip] [gaia] 5G: It's the Network, Stupid
X-BeenThere: stackevo-discuss@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Stack Evolution Discussion List <stackevo-discuss.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/stackevo-discuss>, <mailto:stackevo-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stackevo-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:stackevo-discuss@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stackevo-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/stackevo-discuss>, <mailto:stackevo-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 16:57:53 -0000

Why does yet another term need to be defined for what has been traditionally called a multi-tenant VPN. 

Dino

> On Dec 21, 2015, at 3:55 PM, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/17/2015 9:49 AM, Linda Dunbar wrote:
>> I strongly support the concept of network slicing for Applications or IoT networks. 
> 
> FWIW, I do not - in specific, I support the notion of per-service
> overlays, but would not call them "slices".
> 
> Slices are an artifact of an OS-view of the network. It's a network
> partitioning model that considers cross-overlay interaction only as a
> violation of the model itself.
> 
> We should be careful to consider that networks end at network interfaces
> and network interface names, not OS partitions - and OS partitions are
> the baggage that comes with the term "slice".
> 
> Joe
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 5gangip mailing list
> 5gangip@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/5gangip