IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Stackevo-discuss] [5gangip] [gaia] 5G: It's the Network, Stupid

Jon Crowcroft <Jon.Crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk> Tue, 22 December 2015 17:32 UTC

Return-Path: <Jon.Crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: stackevo-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stackevo-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104C81A88DC; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 09:32:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cANiEGee17gx; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 09:32:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta0.cl.cam.ac.uk (mta0.cl.cam.ac.uk [128.232.25.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66FD81A88CF; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 09:32:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from svr-ssh-1.cl.cam.ac.uk ([128.232.102.11] ident=jac22) by mta0.cl.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <Jon.Crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk>) id 1aBQne-0001st-9g; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 17:32:38 +0000
From: Jon Crowcroft <Jon.Crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <6EE22057-5EB9-4489-A50D-7B92DA2B96AF@gmail.com>
References: <82AB329A76E2484D934BBCA77E9F5249A682F744@Hydra.office.hd> <CAEeTej+pHehyX7+qteogQcAkCcJKYhZoQKStuXGmAzWRj1_rXQ@mail.gmail.com> <F8355406-91C7-4B96-995C-1AD9D7997DC1@kcl.ac.uk> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F657DB3A7F@dfweml701-chm> <56789156.2020704@isi.edu> <6EE22057-5EB9-4489-A50D-7B92DA2B96AF@gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> message dated "Tue, 22 Dec 2015 08:57:46 -0800."
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <27267.1450805558.1@svr-ssh-1.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 17:32:38 +0000
Message-Id: <E1aBQne-0001st-9g@mta0.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stackevo-discuss/pk1HVN4Bs-W95MfcAHpNqEAEeVM>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 05:00:45 -0800
Cc: "icnrg@irtf.org" <icnrg@irtf.org>, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>, gaia <gaia@irtf.org>, "stackevo-discuss@iab.org" <stackevo-discuss@iab.org>, Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>, "marnew@iab.org" <marnew@iab.org>, "5gangip@ietf.org" <5gangip@ietf.org>, Nishanth Sastry <nishanth.sastry@kcl.ac.uk>, Dirk Kutscher <Dirk.Kutscher@neclab.eu>, "dtn-interest@irtf.org" <dtn-interest@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Stackevo-discuss] [5gangip] [gaia] 5G: It's the Network, Stupid
X-BeenThere: stackevo-discuss@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Stack Evolution Discussion List <stackevo-discuss.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/stackevo-discuss>, <mailto:stackevo-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stackevo-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:stackevo-discuss@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stackevo-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/stackevo-discuss>, <mailto:stackevo-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 17:32:48 -0000

> Why does yet another term need to be defined for what has been 
> traditionally called a multi-tenant VPN.

well, slices came out of planetlab, which is not really a spring
chicken (but nor was it a thanksgiving turkey:)
> Dino
> 
> > On Dec 21, 2015, at 3:55 PM, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/17/2015 9:49 AM, Linda Dunbar wrote:
> >> I strongly support the concept of network slicing for Applications or 
> IoT networks.
> >
> > FWIW, I do not - in specific, I support the notion of per-service
> > overlays, but would not call them "slices".
> >
> > Slices are an artifact of an OS-view of the network. It's a network
> > partitioning model that considers cross-overlay interaction only as a
> > violation of the model itself.
> >
> > We should be careful to consider that networks end at network interfaces
> > and network interface names, not OS partitions - and OS partitions are
> > the baggage that comes with the term "slice".
> >
> > Joe
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > 5gangip mailing list
> > 5gangip@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/5gangip
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email