Re: [Stackevo] an agenda for Wednesday's meeting

"Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch> Wed, 27 March 2019 10:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@trammell.ch>
X-Original-To: stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925C71202C0 for <stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 03:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qmTNUlMvsE8K for <stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 03:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-sh.infomaniak.ch (smtp-sh.infomaniak.ch [128.65.195.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 101EC120564 for <stackevo@iab.org>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 03:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp7.infomaniak.ch (smtp7.infomaniak.ch [83.166.132.30]) by smtp-sh.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x2RAs3b0022508 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 27 Mar 2019 11:54:03 +0100
Received: from [IPv6:2001:67c:1232:144:f122:e7e8:c4c9:a1f1] ([IPv6:2001:67c:1232:144:f122:e7e8:c4c9:a1f1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp7.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x2RArqP3144780 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Mar 2019 11:53:57 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
From: "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch>
In-Reply-To: <CAD62q9XpoLyBNANj81Ax42vjH80Ex9ZSmHjLJoPHV16oH-SVEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 11:53:52 +0100
Cc: Stackevo <stackevo@iab.org>, Cindy Morgan <cmorgan@amsl.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <04640D20-ECAA-4A82-8B14-0176242389CC@trammell.ch>
References: <6C66F810-1168-42C3-B4B5-CBBABBE60349@trammell.ch> <CAD62q9XpoLyBNANj81Ax42vjH80Ex9ZSmHjLJoPHV16oH-SVEw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
X-Antivirus: Dr.Web (R) for Unix mail servers drweb plugin ver.6.0.2.8
X-Antivirus-Code: 0x100000
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stackevo/bSUt3ZwAnArREOMxScDG2DXH5S4>
Subject: Re: [Stackevo] an agenda for Wednesday's meeting
X-BeenThere: stackevo@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Stack Evolution Program Mailing List <stackevo.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/stackevo>, <mailto:stackevo-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stackevo/>
List-Post: <mailto:stackevo@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stackevo-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/stackevo>, <mailto:stackevo-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 10:54:23 -0000

hi Aaron,

I am working under that assumption, yes. (Cindy, we do have food for stackevo, correct?)

Cheers,

Brian

> On 27 Mar 2019, at 11:50, Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>  Hey Brian,
> 
> Do we get lunch at this meeting? (I am always concerned about the next meal.)
> 
> — aaron
> 
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 15:04 Brian Trammell (IETF) <ietf@trammell.ch> wrote:
> Greetings, all,
> 
> >From discussions with the IAB and in the hallway in Prague, I'd propose a few topics of discussion for our meeting on Wednesday (13:20 in Herkovcka, mezzanine level)
> 
> (1) next/final steps on draft-thomson-use-it-or-lose-it: we'd like to get this draft ready to send up to the IAB for adoption soon.
> 
> (2) next/(final) steps for the Stack Evolution Program: what else do we want to do after finishing use-it-or-lose-it? 
> 
> This is my now-traditional annual attempt to declare victory and close the program.
> 
> (3) Following up on a question Aaron posed in the hallway: 
> 
> "To what extent is compute a part of the current Internet architecture, and to what extent are we poorly served by not treating it as such?".. This is possibly a less intractable rephrasing of the "what is an endpoint?" question. The end-to-end model we use for the Internet really only applies up to a front-end load balancer for an increasing proportion of Internet traffic. To borrow a phrase from the past, everything on the other side of that LB is a catanet, albeit one that still kinda-mostly runs some transport/application stack atop IP.
> 
> What implications does this development (which has basically already happened with the migration of everything on the server-side not already on a CDN into one or more public clouds) have for the evolution of the stack and the architecture?
> 
> We could probably spend unbounded time on the question above; I'd like to know if anyone has other questions to address?
> 
> Thanks, cheers,
> 
> Brian
> _______________________________________________
> Stackevo mailing list
> Stackevo@iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/stackevo
> -- 
> -- aaron Sent from Gmail Mobile
> _______________________________________________
> Stackevo mailing list
> Stackevo@iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/stackevo