Re: [Stackevo] an agenda for Wednesday's meeting

"Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch> Mon, 25 March 2019 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@trammell.ch>
X-Original-To: stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197D9120407 for <stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 07:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V0RNQ0u1C_Ob for <stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 07:16:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-sh2.infomaniak.ch (smtp-sh2.infomaniak.ch [128.65.195.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2A9D1203F0 for <stackevo@iab.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 07:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp8.infomaniak.ch (smtp8.infomaniak.ch [83.166.132.38]) by smtp-sh.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x2PEGDeV000403 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:16:13 +0100
Received: from [IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:9c9d:200:27a8:68c3] ([IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:9c9d:200:27a8:68c3]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp8.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x2PEGDkg071783 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:16:13 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
From: "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch>
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR21MB0168184A0AA603523836BC45A35E0@CY4PR21MB0168.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:16:12 +0100
Cc: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, Stackevo <stackevo@iab.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <871D4DE7-00A6-4EC4-B001-BF6F0BCBC238@trammell.ch>
References: <6C66F810-1168-42C3-B4B5-CBBABBE60349@trammell.ch> <C39ECAC6-49DF-4A55-86F0-9D43B90ACC56@cisco.com> <CY4PR21MB0168184A0AA603523836BC45A35E0@CY4PR21MB0168.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
X-Antivirus: Dr.Web (R) for Unix mail servers drweb plugin ver.6.0.2.8
X-Antivirus-Code: 0x100000
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stackevo/n9MbH-YiOB6sV5ofttfw0-YR38U>
Subject: Re: [Stackevo] an agenda for Wednesday's meeting
X-BeenThere: stackevo@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Stack Evolution Program Mailing List <stackevo.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/stackevo>, <mailto:stackevo-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stackevo/>
List-Post: <mailto:stackevo@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stackevo-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/stackevo>, <mailto:stackevo-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 14:16:23 -0000

hi Dave,

this looks interesting, and not just for taps. :)

Let's put this in front of the compute topic.

Cheers,

Brian

> On 25 Mar 2019, at 15:14, Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> I would like 5 minutes or so to discuss an architectural issue discussed in section 4 of my latest draft:
> draft-thaler-iftype-reg-01.   Specifically about stack evolution of the stack _below_ layer 3 (which taking
> tunnels into account might also involve layers above layer 3).
> 
> I'll present the draft in intarea on Thursday.
> 
> Dave
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stackevo <stackevo-bounces@iab.org> On Behalf Of Eliot Lear
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 3:08 PM
> To: Brian Trammell (IETF) <ietf@trammell.ch>
> Cc: Stackevo <stackevo@iab.org>
> Subject: Re: [Stackevo] an agenda for Wednesday's meeting
> 
> Hi Brian,
> 
>> On 25 Mar 2019, at 15:04, Brian Trammell (IETF) <ietf@trammell.ch> wrote:
>> 
>> "To what extent is compute a part of the current Internet architecture, and to what extent are we poorly served by not treating it as such?". This is possibly a less intractable rephrasing of the "what is an endpoint?" question. The end-to-end model we use for the Internet really only applies up to a front-end load balancer for an increasing proportion of Internet traffic. To borrow a phrase from the past, everything on the other side of that LB is a catanet, albeit one that still kinda-mostly runs some transport/application stack atop IP.
>> 
>> What implications does this development (which has basically already happened with the migration of everything on the server-side not already on a CDN into one or more public clouds) have for the evolution of the stack and the architecture?
>> 
>> We could probably spend unbounded time on the question above; I'd like to know if anyone has other questions to address?
> 
> I believe we looked at something similar to this some time ago, and it revolved around the question, “what is an endpoint?”  We never really did answer that question and I do think it is worthy of some review from time to time, because our understanding of it evolves over time.
> 
> Eliot
> _______________________________________________
> Stackevo mailing list
> Stackevo@iab.org
> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.iab.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fstackevo&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cdthaler%40microsoft.com%7C6d5d2c5a50c34dd905f208d6b12b5c67%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636891197124522378&amp;sdata=zr9v69%2FEEghvQU7Pn%2F5ImRok%2F4lc02YXk26qujo0LeI%3D&amp;reserved=0
>