IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Stackevo] meeting in Bangkok?

"Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch> Wed, 24 October 2018 13:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@trammell.ch>
X-Original-To: stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C46128CF3 for <stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hmFCouHvdkRj for <stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gozo.iway.ch (gozo.iway.ch [IPv6:2001:8e0:40:325::36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E57AE127332 for <stackevo@iab.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gozo.iway.ch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DEE4341E32; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:38:05 +0200 (CEST)
X-Iway-Path: 0
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ACF/20439.24622); Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:38:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from switchplus-mail.ch (switchplus-mail.ch [212.25.8.236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gozo.iway.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:38:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [195.176.111.10] (account ietf@trammell.ch HELO public-docking-cx-2490.ethz.ch) by switchplus-mail.ch (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2.8) with ESMTPSA id 71439054; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:38:04 +0200
From: "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch>
Message-Id: <5699C30D-D0D1-4B13-AC4E-B8364849FD9C@trammell.ch>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8AF67873-41A5-4F01-82B1-074BC3FF6C8A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:38:03 +0200
In-Reply-To: <8F676418-9328-4BBE-940E-E5116BECF22D@apple.com>
Cc: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>, Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>, Stackevo <stackevo@iab.org>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
References: <2870481F-C1FA-4EA6-A7E5-D6FEEBD75298@trammell.ch> <F59C99CA-03AF-436E-99BC-3C22FFC44405@apple.com> <CAKKJt-eS5Y5ck9nSmDZT3xiD+VzadOaYf=XF-+ta+=ENU6Ax8Q@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMD4bB5JCLw5THLoc5K06oB6YcWTDBDXudXJwoRvadZW7A@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-fJph+C=U43kez_BKubh-XX6Wo7W9V_tGB0=eXX-x_PDQ@mail.gmail.com> <FE58B94A-7276-4789-A4BE-9063C2933351@apple.com> <65E804D6-8C15-420F-9F12-F9C4B3F14FE4@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <CA+9kkMCo8rnzCEe44yRnjRMnqTCx3ST6AwoZoVoNZp2JH1gzig@mail.gmail.com> <2B931CA3-CFDD-4813-B9F9-9CDEB2355609@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <118DE427-E14E-4326-8A0E-2F974CE2AEDC@gmail.com> <8F676418-9328-4BBE-940E-E5116BECF22D@apple.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stackevo/nq87PVOqnK0b-DCu8qMqYO9Qzvc>
Subject: Re: [Stackevo] meeting in Bangkok?
X-BeenThere: stackevo@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Stack Evolution Program Mailing List <stackevo.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/stackevo>, <mailto:stackevo-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stackevo/>
List-Post: <mailto:stackevo@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stackevo-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/stackevo>, <mailto:stackevo-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:38:12 -0000

We often do Wednesday lunches, WG chair forum notwithstanding.

> On 24 Oct 2018, at 15:36, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> wrote:
> 
> Wednesday lunch works for me too. That does conflict with the WG chair forum—would that be a hard blocker for anyone?
> 
> It looks like the IAB room also may not be available then so we’d need to find a space.
> 
> Tommy
> 
> On Oct 22, 2018, at 8:27 AM, Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Works for me.
>> 
>> On 22 Oct 2018, at 11:22, Mirja Kühlewind wrote:
>> 
>> :-(
>> 
>> Wednesday lunch then?
>> 
>> Am 22.10.2018 um 17:19 schrieb Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>:
>> 
>> Monday and Thursday are the scheduled breakfasts, LLC is Tuesday, taking over the IAOC slot.
>> 
>> Ted
>> 
>> Mobile/Terse
>> 
>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 3:11 AM Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch> wrote:
>> Ted, when are the IAB breakfast meeting?
>> 
>> I’m usually more awake Tuesday breakfast than Thursday breakfast, so I would go for that option if the IAB does not have a breakfast there…
>> 
>> Mirja
>> 
>> 
>> Am 19.10.2018 um 19:35 schrieb Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>:
>> 
>> Thanks, Spencer!
>> 
>> So, it looks like the best options are Tuesday breakfast, Thursday breakfast, or Friday (late?) breakfast.
>> 
>> If you have a conflict with one of those, please reply, otherwise we can just select one of those to meet.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Tommy
>> On Oct 10, 2018, at 12:34 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi, Ted,
>> 
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 2:17 PM Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 12:03 PM Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi, Tommy,
>> 
>> The IESG and IAB are trying to figure out when we will actually have the Week in Review session that is usually after the last session on Friday. I don't know what the IAB is thinking (the IAB members would), but the IESG is supposed to talk about this on tomorrow's telechat..
>> 
>> 
>> The original plan was to have it between 10:00 and 11:30 on Friday (so folks could either sleep in or have breakfast meetings), so that's nominally what the IAB is thinking. I understand that the IESG is reconsidering after some questions on side meetings came up, but I asked Tommy to hold that slot aside because of the original plan. If the plan shifts, this will need to get folded into the schedule planning.
>> 
>> Thanks for the clues - and I wasn't sure what IESG discussion had made it to the IAB. You and Tommy definitely handled this correctly - I hope that was clear in my note.
>> 
>> Spencer
>> 
>> If folks are okay missing the WG chairs lunch, Wednesday lunch may also be a possibility.
>> 
>> Ted
>> 
>> So I'm all in for Tuesday or Thursday, and for whatever slot on Friday the IESG and IAB aren't occupying.
>> 
>> Of course, meeting without us could be a bug, or a feature. Make good choices ;-)
>> 
>> Spencer
>> _______________________________________________
>> Stackevo mailing list
>> Stackevo@iab.org
>> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/stackevo
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Stackevo mailing list
>> Stackevo@iab.org
>> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/stackevo
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Stackevo mailing list
>> Stackevo@iab.org
>> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/stackevo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email