[Status] 答复: DRAFT minutes from the SPRING 1st WG meeting at IETF88

Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com> Tue, 12 November 2013 03:07 UTC

Return-Path: <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: status@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: status@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35FC211E819A for <status@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 19:07:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.13
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.13 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.658, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ABFPfrGQFYzW for <status@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 19:07:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6583511E8189 for <status@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 19:07:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AXT99412; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 03:07:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 03:06:32 +0000
Received: from NKGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.34) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 03:07:26 +0000
Received: from NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.193]) by nkgeml403-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.34]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:56:32 +0800
From: Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>, "<status@ietf.org>" <status@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: DRAFT minutes from the SPRING 1st WG meeting at IETF88
Thread-Index: AQHO2cSHklPivvqJ6ke/Dt+VYcH8LZogt4eAgAAo4IA=
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 01:56:31 +0000
Message-ID: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE08228298@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <A5C2F302-5500-4535-B880-DF9BC08C0603@cisco.com> <CEA6C3B6.40E61%aretana@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CEA6C3B6.40E61%aretana@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.98.134]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "Carlos Pignataro \(cpignata\)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
Subject: [Status] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogRFJBRlQgbWludXRlcyBmcm9tIHRoZSBTUFJJ?= =?gb2312?b?TkcgMXN0IFdHIG1lZXRpbmcgYXQgSUVURjg4?=
X-BeenThere: status@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <status.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/status>, <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/status>
List-Post: <mailto:status@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/status>, <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 03:07:44 -0000

Hi Alvaro,

The following minutes is not correct since draft-xu-rtgwg-global-label-adv has not been presented.

o Advertising Global Labels Using IGP

  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-rtgwg-global-label-adv

  Xiaohu Xu                                            10 minutes

?Alvaro: You have 4 minutes…
?Zhenbin: Next. Background, Virtual Operators want to use virtual network to deploy services. They do not want to know the details of the physical network. Based on this we have this doc.
?… here we implement the MPLS virtual network. This is the physical network operator. There is an IGP controller and IGP client. There’s a central IGP controller. And there are virtual network operators that can have virtual network topologies. 
?… here we can see an example. The MPLS Global label identifies the topology. You do not see the details of the underlying network.
?… We have this draft in ISIS, and we ant this solution for failure solutions.
?… we propose these attributes for a virtual link. 
?… this is the forwarding in the virtual network. We have the virtual link, virtual node, and virtual topology.
?… We want to build the global label for muti-topology FIB.


Best regards,
Xiaohu
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: status-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:status-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Alvaro
> Retana (aretana)
> 发送时间: 2013年11月12日 6:27
> 收件人: <status@ietf.org>
> 抄送: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
> 主题: Re: [Status] DRAFT minutes from the SPRING 1st WG meeting at IETF88
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I just posted the (updated) draft minutes from last week.
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/minutes/minutes-88-spring
> 
> Thanks to Carlos for being the note taker.
> 
> Alvaro.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> status mailing list
> status@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/status