Re: [Status] IETF 88 Agenda Items

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <> Wed, 23 October 2013 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645DA11E824C for <>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 14:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BGWoPA8ki7hH for <>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 14:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E985D11E8273 for <>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 14:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=14967; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1382564743; x=1383774343; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=nxxz8WtwWkX5jOG6eESMazXhovgD2bzaghSJbbwn9VM=; b=DnxurasJ0InkzZ2ywrtQNh2v1/fSG8HK+yI4DiX0cBce4Xrij71cl6Or cLktcgRp7HW7jen8MQ79CPa4g4hx0azJlchE/ru8YA7HAKp2Na1evCHAe 74nDJ7Gp72ufOxRRWvlHn5QGhCin7btzcPVv68kHuqUgUNQeqKb6aNh6s A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,557,1378857600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="275813083"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 23 Oct 2013 21:45:31 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9NLjV56002582 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:45:31 GMT
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:45:30 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <>
To: "" <>
Thread-Topic: [Status] IETF 88 Agenda Items
Thread-Index: AQHOynGSXDdMesgLNkyT5jtq/G06P5oC7kAA
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:45:30 +0000
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BBD66FD99311804F80324E8139B3C94E396BA73Bxmbalnx15ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Status] IETF 88 Agenda Items
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:46:19 -0000


For some reason I don't have access to publish the agenda..while I get it fixed, here is the draft agenda (below).  The revised agenda is due on Monday.



Source Packet Routing in Networking WG (spring)

IETF 88 (Vancouver) Agenda


CHAIR(s):  John Scudder <>

           Alvaro Retana <>

MONDAY, November 4, 2013

1450-1720  Afternoon Session II

Regency B

o Administrivia

  Chairs                                               15 minutes

                                         (or as long as it takes)

  - Note Well

  - Scribe

  - Blue Sheets

  - BOF/WG Status + Charter Review

o Segment Routing Use Cases

  TBD                                                  15 minutes

o Performance Engineered LSPs using the Segment Routing Data-Plane

  TBD                                                  10 minutes

o Analysis of the Overhead of Source Routing in SP Networks

  Peter Ashwook-Smith                                   5 minutes

o Segment Routing Architecture

  Stefano Previdi                                      10 minutes

o Segment Routing Fast Reroute

  Pierre Francois                                      10 minutes

o Advertising Global Labels Using IGP

  Xiaohu Xu                                            10 minutes

o Signaling Entropy Label Capability Using Interior Gateway Protocols

  Xiaohu Xu                                             5 minutes

o Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping/Trace for Segment

  Nobo Akiya                                            ? minutes

On 10/16/13 3:13 PM, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <<>> wrote:


We have a 2 1/2 hour slot in Vancouver on Monday afternoon:

1450-1720  Afternoon Session II
Regency B               RTG     spring          Source Packet Routing in Networking WG

Even though the agenda already lists us as the 'spring WG', the process hasn't finished and we're still a BOF.  Because of that, the first part of the agenda will be to resolve any issues that still remain.  If spring does become a WG before the meeting we will clearly not need that time.

We would like to start collecting proposals for agenda items at this time.  Please send your request to John and I.  We will prioritize the items already listed as milestones in the charter: use cases, architecture, solutions, etc.  Other items may be considered if we have time.

Please note that we will be requiring two conditions to be part of the final agenda: (1) your draft MUST have been published already, and (2) you MUST provide the chairs with your slides by EOD on Friday, November 1st, 2013.

Keep the following dates in mind:

Oct/21: cut-ff date for ID submission.  It would be very nice if your drafts are published with the -spring– name in them.
Oct/23: Draft WG agendas are due
Oct/28: Revised WG agendas are due


Alvaro + John