[Status] 答复: Status of Spring

Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com> Sat, 12 October 2013 03:05 UTC

Return-Path: <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: status@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: status@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC6121F9CAF for <status@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.862
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.862 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.926, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tRhtk6S9LNmz for <status@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176BC21F9CBF for <status@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:05:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AYZ69792; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 03:05:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.0; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 04:05:16 +0100
Received: from NKGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.35) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.0; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 04:05:47 +0100
Received: from NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.24]) by nkgeml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.35]) with mapi id 14.03.0146.000; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 11:05:33 +0800
From: Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
To: Hannes Gredler <hannes@juniper.net>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Thread-Topic: [Status] Status of Spring
Thread-Index: AQHOxftv4CKyAtw8vUuUlcOO89jTl5nu0g0AgAAfeACAABPvgIABTu/A
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 03:05:33 +0000
Message-ID: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE08215A89@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <52569169.20404@cisco.com> <CA+b+ERmj13sz4yi+aQXwGKuu7boOKkz6CbcB9pYXqHV-_FMhSw@mail.gmail.com> <5256F76D.9080905@cisco.com> <7AE6A4247B044C4ABE0A5B6BF427F8E209913009@dfweml513-mbb.china.huawei.com> <339a1b4a20e74d719c7669a4f09ac337@BY2PR05MB142.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CA+b+ER=yE=mPi_CgV=8oyiykUvhd2BGVf7S7BZ36M0AF3gy0mA@mail.gmail.com> <7AE6A4247B044C4ABE0A5B6BF427F8E20991312A@dfweml513-mbb.china.huawei.com> <CA+b+ERk3Xpp3mizRhij5EMUsRcXMg4Qfh=6da-3t1S-Anf6_UQ@mail.gmail.com> <20131011110724.GB29384@juniper.net> <CA+b+ER=wEfYP5wdO=SFVd2Qdm2tdzBjbfYXKkvfr2wzadTE09A@mail.gmail.com> <20131011141123.GD29526@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <20131011141123.GD29526@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.98.134]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "status@ietf.org" <status@ietf.org>, AshwoodsmithPeter <Peter.AshwoodSmith@huawei.com>
Subject: [Status] 答复: Status of Spring
X-BeenThere: status@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <status.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/status>, <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/status>
List-Post: <mailto:status@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/status>, <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 03:05:59 -0000


> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: status-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:status-bounces@ietf.org] 代表
> Hannes Gredler
> 发送时间: 2013年10月11日 22:11
> 收件人: Robert Raszuk
> 抄送: status@ietf.org; AshwoodsmithPeter
> 主题: Re: [Status] Status of Spring
> 
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 03:00:02PM +0200, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> | > please have a look at
> | >
> http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/mpls-linux/index.php?title=Main_Page
> |
> | [ ... ] Please point me to any
> | linux distribution which officially supports this. Also please point
> | me to the official linux kernel which supports mpls kernel project.
> 
> i am not sure if there is such a thing as an "official linux kernel"
>   of course there is linus' and his lieutenants git trees - however
>   every major linux distribution pulls from there and adds a ton
>   of patches to it. - the linux MPLS extensions are basically
>   kernel patches plus userspace utilizities - nothing more.
>   so if you want to get it to work - get your favourite
>   (linux from scratch) distro and apply the patches ...
>   i did it with 'gentoo' linux and as far as i can tell it works fine
>   even with l2vpn services on top of the transport LSPs.
>     note that there are also pre-cooked debian ISO images with everything
>     applied if you do not want to compile your kernel by yourself.
> 
> | > can you point me to the text which says so.
> | > i could not find such a claim in rfc3031 ?
> |
> | Not in rfc3031 but in rfc5036 .. pretty much the only practical
> | signalling protocol for mpls transport (not an overlay mpls
> | signalling):
> |
> |    "Prefix SHOULD NOT use the label for forwarding unless its routing
> |     table contains an entry that exactly matches the FEC Element."
> 
> oh yes, and this is indeed problematic ... and its fixed here:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5283.txt

Great that LDP has removed that limitation. When using ISIS or OSPF for label distribution purpose, we should follow the same principle. In this way, the scalability of IGP would not be impacted by the SPRING architecture.

Best regards,
Xiaohu

> _______________________________________________
> status mailing list
> status@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/status