Re: [Status] IETF 88 Agenda Items
"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Wed, 30 October 2013 18:58 UTC
Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: status@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: status@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6034621F9E51 for <status@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wy3w3nUrT3Le for <status@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D6621F9DD5 for <status@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6675; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1383159510; x=1384369110; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=LBbD44N2icHhjPqiVzri6I+x0z5N3bcagtzsQEGbEZw=; b=L0gKWosTlcskpu5F34grxGR0N6lAGI9beGRKQwUrBR2XfT5J6A3BZT3K ysJhq8ERNP6e510zlbIhzVYK8X5hWCcl+HDdTX+alcQV1/LCC6IMzdd6V 39ROE1pTgkKWlMbbrMyZG0iTsBoGsxbxcfcvpi+0ngKEr5K9vCp7alN5w g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtAFAItWcVKtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABYAYJDRDhUv1SBKBZtB4InAQSBCwEIEhAPAQEMORQDDgIEEwgTh2wNmQ2hWQSPHi0KASMEAYJ3gQ0DqhODJoIq
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,603,1378857600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="278652176"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Oct 2013 18:58:30 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com [173.37.183.76]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9UIwSxC003566 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <status@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:58:28 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.9.171]) by xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([173.37.183.76]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:58:28 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "status@ietf.org" <status@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Status] IETF 88 Agenda Items
Thread-Index: AQHOynGSXDdMesgLNkyT5jtq/G06P5oNv+cA
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:58:28 +0000
Message-ID: <BBD66FD99311804F80324E8139B3C94E3971DA12@xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <BBD66FD99311804F80324E8139B3C94E3964149E@xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.82.254.89]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BBD66FD99311804F80324E8139B3C94E3971DA12xmbalnx15ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Status] IETF 88 Agenda Items
X-BeenThere: status@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <status.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/status>, <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/status>
List-Post: <mailto:status@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/status>, <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:58:39 -0000
Hi! The final agenda is published here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/88/agenda/spring As it says below, we need the slides by EOD on Friday November 1st (this Friday!). Everyone on the agenda requested a slot, so this shouldn't be a surprise..but since I'm posting the agenda a little late, then we'll still accept slides on Saturday. The objective is to share the slides from our computer and not have to switch. We want to focus on on the earlier milestones in the charter first. To that end, we will take advantage of the face-to-face meeting to facilitate the discussion of drafts related to those earlier milestones. This means that (while the agenda shows enough time to cover all the topics) we may not have time to hear every presentation. Thanks! Alvaro. On 10/16/13 3:13 PM, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com<mailto:aretana@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi! We have a 2 1/2 hour slot in Vancouver on Monday afternoon: 1450-1720 Afternoon Session II Regency B RTG spring Source Packet Routing in Networking WG Even though the agenda already lists us as the 'spring WG', the process hasn't finished and we're still a BOF. Because of that, the first part of the agenda will be to resolve any issues that still remain. If spring does become a WG before the meeting we will clearly not need that time. We would like to start collecting proposals for agenda items at this time. Please send your request to John and I. We will prioritize the items already listed as milestones in the charter: use cases, architecture, solutions, etc. Other items may be considered if we have time. Please note that we will be requiring two conditions to be part of the final agenda: (1) your draft MUST have been published already, and (2) you MUST provide the chairs with your slides by EOD on Friday, November 1st, 2013. Keep the following dates in mind: Oct/21: cut-ff date for ID submission. It would be very nice if your drafts are published with the -spring– name in them. Oct/23: Draft WG agendas are due Oct/28: Revised WG agendas are due Thanks! Alvaro + John
- [Status] IETF 88 Agenda Items Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [Status] IETF 88 Agenda Items Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [Status] IETF 88 Agenda Items Alvaro Retana (aretana)