[Status] Status of Spring
Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Thu, 10 October 2013 18:53 UTC
Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: status@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: status@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC43021F9C99 for <status@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:53:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NcjgdSHP429J for <status@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-4.cisco.com (ams-iport-4.cisco.com [144.254.224.147]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C1E21E8117 for <status@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1184; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1381431170; x=1382640770; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AtshHEsBn+eoJRCDMg2QYlmoPMIK3vrNk/txFf2ETpo=; b=hniPPUD6S9oUFStfQJvfyPvEjCFDOFJabO8ePGsmSVOOGRGhvq1eRegC U0abHFO43fhJ8Vbudpf78+FhflATDd3bVzgSyI531EitkmX4/EC19ethl ymkdvo3YU/3CS5B46HT3d6RlacwILd+3ZR0EW2Qhd4aJTqz60V3pIk17j I=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,1074,1371081600"; d="scan'208";a="18673873"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Oct 2013 18:52:39 +0000
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.70.36]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9AIqWom006686 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:52:34 GMT
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cisco.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id r9AIqTcn018351; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:52:30 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <5256F76D.9080905@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:52:29 +0100
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "status@ietf.org" <status@ietf.org>
References: <52569169.20404@cisco.com> <CA+b+ERmj13sz4yi+aQXwGKuu7boOKkz6CbcB9pYXqHV-_FMhSw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERmj13sz4yi+aQXwGKuu7boOKkz6CbcB9pYXqHV-_FMhSw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, "John G. Scudder" <jgs@bgp.nu>, Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com>
Subject: [Status] Status of Spring
X-BeenThere: status@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <status.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/status>, <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/status>
List-Post: <mailto:status@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/status>, <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:53:30 -0000
The SPRING charter was discussed on the telechat today. We have a small issue with the OAM and management deliverable text that I am working with Benoit. The largest sticking point is the IPv6 text, where a number of ADs are concerned that given the previous security issues with source routing, they are concerned at the difficulty we face significant difficulty designing a satisfactory IPv6 solution. There was some discussion on the call about limited network scope, but concern was expressed that once the feature was in the wild, the scope would be difficult to control. Jari who is the main discuss holder will work with us over the next couple of days to try to get some text that will allow us to go forward. The goal is to get the charter into external review by Monday night so it can go to external review on Tuesday and be on the following telechat for approval by Vancouver. Currently SPRING is of course a BOF and I have asked Alvaro Retana, and John Scudder to chair the BOF in Vanouver. If the charter text still has unresolved issues by the time we meet in Vancouver, then they should be the first priority on the agenda. - Stewart
- [Status] Charter security text Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Status] Charter security text Robert Raszuk
- [Status] Status of Spring Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Status] Status of Spring AshwoodsmithPeter
- Re: [Status] Status of Spring John E Drake
- Re: [Status] Status of Spring Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Status] Status of Spring AshwoodsmithPeter
- Re: [Status] Status of Spring AshwoodsmithPeter
- [Status] Please trim your cc John G. Scudder
- Re: [Status] Status of Spring Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Status] Status of Spring Jari Arkko
- Re: [Status] Status of Spring John G. Scudder
- Re: [Status] Status of Spring Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Status] Status of Spring joel jaeggli
- [Status] 答复: Status of Spring Xuxiaohu
- Re: [Status] 答复: Status of Spring Robert Raszuk
- [Status] 答复: 答复: Status of Spring Xuxiaohu
- [Status] 答复: 答复: Status of Spring Xuxiaohu
- Re: [Status] Status of Spring Hannes Gredler
- Re: [Status] Status of Spring Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Status] Status of Spring Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Status] Status of Spring Hannes Gredler
- [Status] 答复: Status of Spring Xuxiaohu
- Re: [Status] 答复: Status of Spring Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Status] Status of Spring Xuxiaohu
- [Status] 答复: Status of Spring Xuxiaohu
- Re: [Status] Status of Spring Xuxiaohu
- Re: [Status] Status of Spring Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Status] Status of Spring Xuxiaohu