Re: [Status] SPRING Charter

[Stewart Bryant <[e-mail]>]

Hi Benoit

Technically it is per packet, and I can see applications where that 
might be
useful. Not too far from your home :) an OAM back to yourself is a flow,
but you might want to explore a different path on each packet.

It would be unfortunate if we lost the generality.

Stewart

On 14/10/2013 14:11, Benoit Claise wrote:
> Stewart,
>
> Yes, I cleared
> For the sake of completeness, one COMMENT left at 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-spring/ballot/#benoit-claise
>
> Regards, Benoit
>
>> Benoit
>>
>> Please can you look at the latest version of the charter.
>>
>> You now has your text. Are you able to clear?
>>
>> Stewart
>>
>> On 13/10/2013 11:29, Benoit Claise wrote:
>>> Stewart,
>>>
>>> The following two paragraphs are redundant
>>>
>>>     SPRING should both provide support for its use as
>>>     an OAM tool in SPRING enabled networks, and the
>>>     necessary OAM and other management tools needed to
>>>     manage a SPRING enabled network.
>>>
>>>     The SPRING WG should provide OAM and the
>>>     management needed to manage  SPRING enabled networks.
>>>     The SPRING protocol itself may also be used as a tool for OAM
>>>     in SPRING enabled networks.
>>>
>>> Keep the second one.
>>>
>>> OLD:
>>>     o Specify OAM the mechanisms needed to support SPRING
>>>
>>>     o Publish SPRING management requirements document.
>>>
>>> NEW:
>>>
>>>     o Publish SPRING management requirements document.
>>>
>>>     o Specify_the OAM_  mechanisms needed to support SPRING.
>>>
>>> Regards, Benoit
>>>> Version 12 of the charter text has Jari's security text
>>>> with Hannes' addition of cookies as a method to be
>>>> considered.
>>>>
>>>> I have modified the OAM/Management text to be
>>>> o Specify OAM the mechanisms needed to support SPRING
>>>>
>>>> o Publish SPRING management requirements document.
>>>>
>>>> Benoit, please can you take a look at the above and
>>>> if this is still not what you are looking for
>>>> please provide text. Once we have cleared the Blocking
>>>> comments (probably during external review), I propose
>>>> that we convert the final list to milestones per
>>>> Adrian's comment, in which case the separation is
>>>> better.
>>>> The latest text as always is at:
>>>>
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-spring/
>>>>
>>>> If this satisfies Jari and Benoit's concerns I would like
>>>> to put this in external review, where it is still available
>>>> for comment to polish out any last issues.
>>>>
>>>> - Stewart
>>>
>>
>>
>
> .
>


-- 
For corporate legal information go to:

http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html