Re: [stir] The Canadian Regulator has issued a Notice of Consultation on robocalls spoofing STIR/SHAKEN

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Fri, 03 February 2017 23:58 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373A21293F2; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 15:58:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=bbiw.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A1NcUqHZFt4S; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 15:58:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07007120727; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 15:58:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (76-218-8-128.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id v1400N4k012074 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 3 Feb 2017 16:00:23 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=bbiw.net; s=default; t=1486166423; bh=LKNM8ShJkGUbWx/4+Xd74XD3Gxmn5lW9KfoqCtUqd4I=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=NBmg9z2uCoTrPtkF6/LUl1l5xV+CPTtOs0dLtSZP1M5Z5s3hkdyiGJNj2LJ/O1pAs JU/jY8OZGgZBP8X0CbEat11Yq4MVqF0aqGO+jwAQgqoja0M8k29LIeqM0PJiYmxwT+ 6PLrJqHaNAc7Ev0RbfdeoUF4hWZb4st6D98vZaKo=
To: tony@yaanatech.co.uk, "stir@ietf.org" <stir@ietf.org>, sipcore@ietf.org
References: <7F3DCD21-1085-4961-82D7-CE12DB308305@shockey.us> <a9417cde-33d4-3da2-ad2a-5b83bd81701f@yaanatech.co.uk> <74394dc8-5a61-cb8f-eb9d-98b499256326@dcrocker.net> <5fbc40d2-51f5-7073-f99a-488cd53f8fce@yaanatech.co.uk> <974c2333-aef5-1c93-744c-58dbaaa20ca9@dcrocker.net> <286e60eb-baa3-c4ec-6c32-43e217713310@yaanatech.co.uk>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <3d4c18f8-f08c-8ce9-6e37-5498069ae5df@bbiw.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 15:58:32 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <286e60eb-baa3-c4ec-6c32-43e217713310@yaanatech.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/1V50qV4DAewRqtRG-I938-WEh9o>
Subject: Re: [stir] The Canadian Regulator has issued a Notice of Consultation on robocalls spoofing STIR/SHAKEN
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 23:58:49 -0000

On 2/3/2017 12:00 PM, Tony Rutkowski wrote:
> Mr. Google can point you to all the other
> solutions proffered out there by other bodies
> and national administrations.

Citations to standardized (ie, multilaterally-supported) detailed 
specifications of an integrated service, please.  You are making the 
claim, so you can do the google and proffer the satisfying results.


> Blockchain solutions for dealing with authentication
> requirements such as call spoofing are fast ascending
> and in the long term far more attractive.

If there is a problem with the uptake of STIR/Shaken, what will make the 
uptake of a blockchain-based service -- whatever that might be -- any 
better?

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net