Re: [stir] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-stir-rph-05
"Das, Subir" <sdas@appcomsci.com> Fri, 18 May 2018 14:10 UTC
Return-Path: <sdas@appcomsci.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7537D12D962; Fri, 18 May 2018 07:10:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7ge2nr-PZcm4; Fri, 18 May 2018 07:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from thumper.appcomsci.com (thumper.appcomsci.com [205.132.0.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E769A12DA00; Fri, 18 May 2018 07:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thumper.appcomsci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56039695316; Fri, 18 May 2018 10:08:09 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by SpamTitan at appcomsci.com
Received: from thumper.appcomsci.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thumper.appcomsci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02CBB69530A; Fri, 18 May 2018 10:08:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from bambi.appcomsci.com (bambi.appcomsci.com [192.4.5.54]) by thumper.appcomsci.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E62FD695326; Fri, 18 May 2018 10:08:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from brg-exmb1.ats.atsinnovate.com (exch.appcomsci.com [192.4.5.112]) by bambi.appcomsci.com (8.14.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id w4IEAuGJ007838; Fri, 18 May 2018 10:10:56 -0400
Received: from RRC-ATS-EXMB2.ats.atsinnovate.com ([2002:c004:56a::c004:56a]) by brg-ats-exhb1.ats.atsinnovate.com ([fe80::fc05:b53:7f2b:84f9%18]) with mapi id 14.03.0389.001; Fri, 18 May 2018 10:10:56 -0400
From: "Das, Subir" <sdas@appcomsci.com>
To: Tim Chown <tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>
CC: "stir@ietf.org" <stir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-stir-rph.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-stir-rph.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-stir-rph-05
Thread-Index: AQHT5yN0eEweftp9EUOUvEb9qOxe6qQ1lYrQ
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 14:10:55 +0000
Message-ID: <AAC987F0CC2C7845A9FBD8A36D52E12DCBD598C6@rrc-ats-exmb2.ats.atsinnovate.com>
References: <152582174562.2344.5056765466572609119@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <152582174562.2344.5056765466572609119@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.109.16.82]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/2a-m7smR_0xxig3Jqm7GSo52wlY>
Subject: Re: [stir] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-stir-rph-05
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 14:11:00 -0000
Hello Tim, Thanks for your review. We will address the minor nits in next version. -Subir -----Original Message----- From: Tim Chown <tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk> Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 7:22 PM To: ops-dir@ietf.org Cc: stir@ietf.org; draft-ietf-stir-rph.all@ietf.org Subject: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-stir-rph-05 Reviewer: Tim Chown Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. PASSporT (RFC8225) defines a method for creating and validating a token that cryptographically verifies an originating identity or, more generally, a URI or telephone number representing the originator of personal communications. This document extends PASSporT to also support cryptographic signing of the 'SIP Resource Priority' header field indicating resource prioritisation for the communication, to mitigate abuse of that field. The document is quite well written, but includes some repetition of material, in particular in the introduction, and a few minor grammatical issues. The document is Ready for publication, with minor nits. Nits: * Tidy up or simplify the introduction text, which is unnecessarily verbose. * Check the text for grammatical issues, especially use of the indefinite article.