[stir] [IANA #1260382] expert review for draft-ietf-stir-messaging (jwt)

[Amanda Baber via RT <[e-mail]>]

Hi John, Brian, Mike, Chuck (cc: stir wg),

The IETF-IANA group has asked us to require a single approval unless the expert group prefers otherwise. Because we haven't received any responses asking us to wait for further approvals, we're going to mark this document "IANA OK" for tomorrow's telechat.

thanks,
Amanda

On Mon Nov 28 23:36:24 2022, amanda.baber wrote:
> Hi John, Brian, Mike, Chuck (cc: stir wg),
> 
> This document is on Thursday's IESG telechat agenda. We have one
> approval.
> 
> Should we mark this document "IANA OK" now or wait for further
> approvals? If the latter, do you want us to wait until we receive an
> OK from all four experts?
> 
> thanks,
> Amanda
> 
> On Fri Nov 11 08:45:44 2022, [e-mail] wrote:
> > As one of the designated experts, I approve. While the overall
> > subject of
> > the draft is rather out of my depth, the registration of the "msgi"
> > claim
> > seems okay to me.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 5:11 PM Sabrina Tanamal via RT <
> > [e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi John, Brian, Mike, Chuck, (cc: stir wg),
> > >
> > > As the designated experts for the JSON Web Token Claims registry,
> > > can you
> > > review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-stir-messaging for
> > > us?
> > > Please see
> > >
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-stir-messaging
> > >
> > > The due date for this request is November 17th.
> > >
> > > If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication,
> > > we'll
> > > make the registration at
> > >
> > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/jwt
> > >
> > > Let us know if, after reviewing this, you believe that no further
> > > expert
> > > reviews are necessary for this registration.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > Sabrina Tanamal
> > > Lead IANA Services Specialist
> > >
> > >
> >