IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] current draft charter

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Tue, 18 June 2013 15:13 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B1121F9965 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.524
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IHoTkZ-vfKzd for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E1921F94DF for <stir@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.9.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5IFD4QQ020896 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:13:09 -0700
Message-ID: <51C078F1.4020508@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:12:49 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
References: <CDE47FBA.21982%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <275EE7EE-E92C-454A-BD5C-C04BE171AA14@cs.columbia.edu> <4647_1371560112_51C058B0_4647_190_1_B5939C6860701C49AA39C5DA5189448B0A37D8@PEXCVZYM12.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <010701ce6c35$672f6970$358e3c50$@shockey.us>
In-Reply-To: <010701ce6c35$672f6970$358e3c50$@shockey.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: philippe.fouquart@orange.com, dcrocker@bbiw.net, stir@ietf.org, "'Peterson, Jon'" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>, 'Henning Schulzrinne' <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: [stir] current draft charter
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stir>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:13:26 -0000

On 6/18/2013 8:06 AM, Richard Shockey wrote:
> Although people sometimes like using ownership as a shortcut, it's more of a
> right of use really. (I'm sure some here will remember discussions on the
> notion of carrier of record with eye-watering nostalgia)


As someone who's been using the term ownership here, I'll note that I 
indeed meant it as an expedient and am happy to use whatever term is 
already common or that the group prefers.  The 'right to use' is the 
important issue here, not the legality of ownership.

Absent there being an established term, how about assignment and 
assignee, in place of ownership and owner?

d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email