IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 27 May 2021 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3E33A0E4F for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 May 2021 10:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KM1DnAtGX7Wm for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 May 2021 10:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6B083A0E4D for <stir@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 May 2021 10:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F01300BEF for <stir@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 May 2021 13:57:33 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id sTlaKWrO0MWq for <stir@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 May 2021 13:57:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73977300AEF; Thu, 27 May 2021 13:57:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <AEF7CD55-3F51-4B09-B266-D17D721891C5@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_27B6DBC4-044C-4875-BC52-780082B568EE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.20\))
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 13:57:26 -0400
In-Reply-To: <883FF8CA-3B57-4A09-8C3B-193BC2B83CD7@nostrum.com>
Cc: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, stir-chairs@ietf.org, IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
References: <162197342464.31097.13986576482232251508@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwYvxUQTcCFVKVAS=_HsWrPiUWf=hvsfc4Jo+NYp5wTsAg@mail.gmail.com> <883FF8CA-3B57-4A09-8C3B-193BC2B83CD7@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/BsvmRL8duzgGgIjAS9SuLvw7gOs>
Subject: Re: [stir] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 17:57:40 -0000

Ben:

I did try to follow the conventions in RFC 8226.  That said, I'm happy to hear what might make the sepc easier to understand.

Russ

> On May 27, 2021, at 1:12 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> (dons shepherd hat)
> 
> The current quote usage seems to follow the convention of RFC 8226. One could argue about whether 8226 did it right, but it is what it is.
> 
> (I’d argue that “orig” refers to a human-readable-text JWT claim, thus the quotes, while mustInclude refers to an X.509 extension encoded in ASN.1. But that would be just making up stuff.)
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Ben.
> 
> 
>> On May 27, 2021, at 11:11 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com <mailto:superuser@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> A brief AD review; I'm going to Last Call this now as my feedback is minor, so please just factor this in as Last Call feedback:
>> 
>> In Section 3 (and later), stuff like mustInclude and permittedValues aren't quoted, but smaller things like "iat", "orig", and "dest" are.  More generally I found the use or non-use of quotes felt inconsistent.  I don't have a preferred solution, just something to consider.  I don't know what, if anything, the RFC Editor might do if they observe the same.
>> 
>> -MSK
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 1:10 PM Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org <mailto:noreply@ietf.org>> wrote:
>> Robert Sparks has requested publication of draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the STIR working group.
>> 
>> Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226/>
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> stir mailing list
>> stir@ietf.org <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email