Re: [stir] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-stir-rph-emergency-services-02

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Thu, 06 August 2020 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8CAD3A0AEC for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 09:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.028
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.028 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OtDuTMl5JGo7 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 09:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 997213A0A82 for <stir@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 09:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 076G3f9i056409 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <stir@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 11:03:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1596729822; bh=ppHtfnmU5nGlhsUCYHNyILvM/vg8/nfFt5HdI5Aj2n8=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=EpndGtRKsudIJdCy9rxLA+PrsiUOJzusex9Bjb51g/koc8hirEdonNBriRsfgZhnD 5sdy9578kVpPhA2Cyo+TtX5KgxyC343tAp6TkpW+70w3+x/o44The7IvgJxj2WMO8J jTCF84vdBSSIQ/OCXab7CvRHxdSUmeVQxrw5Eibs=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: stir@ietf.org
References: <8372C576-08B7-41C4-B021-38622BABAD25@vigilsec.com> <919FC584-18AF-4419-B174-B9FB37B6439D@vigilsec.com> <1CFC4EFA-1B05-4278-95EB-B9099328F1E7@sn3rd.com> <368b707bae3847aaa83f16ad17b88d3a@att.com> <692801DA-E036-4F4B-B4D7-88E575DC9292@shockey.us>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <2d6df956-653b-1838-6afd-b468dc8b98cd@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 11:03:39 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <692801DA-E036-4F4B-B4D7-88E575DC9292@shockey.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/HbgC3yqTt7_TWt8R9LdaBeIuCYE>
Subject: Re: [stir] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-stir-rph-emergency-services-02
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 16:03:47 -0000

It would be far more useful for me to hear "I have read this draft and 
see nothing that I think needs to change before sending it to IETF LC" 
than to hear +1 for support.

Is that what the +1s so far mean?

RjS

On 8/6/20 9:18 AM, Richard Shockey wrote:
> +1  I support this as well.
>
> —
> Richard Shockey
>
> Shockey Consulting LLC
>
> Chairman of the Board SIP Forum
>
> www.shockey.us
>
> www.sipforum.org
>
> richard<at>shockey.us
>
> Skype-Linkedin-Facebook –Twitter  rshockey101
>
> PSTN +1 703-593-2683
>
>   
>
> On 8/6/20, 8:47 AM, "stir on behalf of DOLLY, MARTIN C" <stir-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of md3135@att.com> wrote:
>
>      I support as well
>
>      -----Original Message-----
>      From: stir <stir-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Sean Turner
>      Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 1:38 AM
>      To: IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
>      Subject: Re: [stir] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-stir-rph-emergency-services-02
>
>      Hi!
>
>      Support moving this one along, and I think these are all minor.
>
>      0) I thought the security considerations was missing something about compromise leading to misuse of network resources, but it’s the 2nd paragraph of s1. That shows you which section I read first ;) Might be worth repeating that s1 blurb in s8 or at least referring to it from s8? Maybe:
>
>        The security consideration enumerated in
>        Section 1 and the security considerations discussed
>        in [RFC8224], Section 12, are applicable.
>
>      1) I hit the nits button (also out of habit) there are a lot unused references and they can be deleted:
>
>      == Unused Reference: 'RFC3261' is defined on line 275, but no explicit
>         reference was found in the text
>
>      == Unused Reference: 'RFC8226' is defined on line 305, but no explicit
>         reference was found in the text
>
>      == Unused Reference: 'RFC7340' is defined on line 322, but no explicit
>         reference was found in the text
>
>      == Unused Reference: 'RFC7375' is defined on line 327, but no explicit
>         reference was found in the text
>
>      == Unused Reference: 'RFC8126' is defined on line 331, but no explicit
>         reference was found in the text
>
>      2) Do the examples in s3.1, 3.2, and s4 match the order required in s5? I.e., shouldn’t the examples be as follow to be in lexicographic order:
>
>      s3.1:
>      {
>       "dest":{["uri":"urn:service:sos"]},
>       "iat":1443208345,
>       "orig":{"tn":"12155551212"},
>       "rph":{"ESorig":["esnet,x"]}
>      }
>
>      s3.2:
>      {
>       "dest":{["tn":"12155551212"]},
>       "iat":1443208345,
>       "orig":{"tn":"12155551213"},
>       "rph":{"EScallback":["esnet,x"]}
>      }
>
>      s4:
>      {
>       "dest":{["tn":"12155551212"]},
>       "iat":1443208345,
>       "orig":{"tn":"12155551213"},
>       "rph":{"EScallback":["esnet,x"]},
>       "sph":"psap-callback"
>      }
>
>      3) In s3.2, there’s a reference to "r-values”. What’s that?
>
>      4) Should this “should only” be a SHOULD:
>
>       The value of the "sph" claim key SHOULD be "psap-callback”
>       to match the SIP Priority header field value for authorized  emergency services callbacks.
>
>      4) In s5, s/order,/order:
>
>      5) In s6, should the compact form for ‘rph’ PASSPORTS be NOT RECOMMENDED, i.e.,
>
>      OLD:
>
>        The use of the compact form of PASSporT is not specified in this
>        document or recommended for 'rph' PASSporTs.
>
>      NEW:
>
>        The use of the compact form of PASSporT is not specified in this
>        document and it is NOT RECOMMENDED for 'rph' PASSporTs.
>
>      6) 2119 and 8174 should be normative references.
>
>      Cheers,
>
>      spt
>
>      > On Jul 31, 2020, at 11:29, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>      >
>      >
>      > This is the STIR WG Last Call for "Assertion Values for a Resource Priority Header Claim and a SIP Priority Header Claim in Support of Emergency Services Networks” <draft-ietf-stir-rph-emergency-services-02>.  Please review the document and send your comments to the STIR WG mail list by 22 August 2020.
>      >
>      > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.
>      > org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dstir-2Drph-2Demergency-2Dservices_&d=DwIGaQ&c=L
>      > FYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=G9v8uCSSQhCmpw7ItG0r2g&m=rc3BKD0F1A86-CRpYcNpr
>      > 3ms70HuQtKNY4CHDOwLFi4&s=wrhfFB0s-E4uOkriBv9h6dXa72267K1J1fyz_BiBkNQ&e
>      > =
>      >
>      > Thanks,
>      > Robert & Russ
>      >
>      > _______________________________________________
>      > stir mailing list
>      > stir@ietf.org
>      > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mail
>      > man_listinfo_stir&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=G9v8uCSSQhCmpw7I
>      > tG0r2g&m=rc3BKD0F1A86-CRpYcNpr3ms70HuQtKNY4CHDOwLFi4&s=ZKKsr6tspW-kbfj
>      > ncoP6hDzO5sgTK73kzp7v8GrK9z0&e=
>
>      _______________________________________________
>      stir mailing list
>      stir@ietf.org
>      https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_stir&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=G9v8uCSSQhCmpw7ItG0r2g&m=rc3BKD0F1A86-CRpYcNpr3ms70HuQtKNY4CHDOwLFi4&s=ZKKsr6tspW-kbfjncoP6hDzO5sgTK73kzp7v8GrK9z0&e=
>      _______________________________________________
>      stir mailing list
>      stir@ietf.org
>      https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> stir mailing list
> stir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir