IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] Last Call: <draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02.txt> (Enhanced JWT Claim Constraints for STIR Certificates) to Proposed Standard

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Mon, 31 May 2021 18:34 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE223A21CB; Mon, 31 May 2021 11:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nA0zPMmajDit; Mon, 31 May 2021 11:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12a.google.com (mail-il1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AF033A21C3; Mon, 31 May 2021 11:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id x18so5172400ila.10; Mon, 31 May 2021 11:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RYAHthnO3FgoSib3N9sCijpSPe0JGsN95UuTRECAx8M=; b=kWTmB+KHNZUfZZ5mn/CYwEiKDcLXjxVXhwAU+51JJfkcIY511VFBNAq1zz4YScTBOS vQLMWb/AUsDeoggPtsyaxMsCvH1DdgQob4AwHiwijg+toavLJlmvdQghyV03PP95MdL8 FryUulibI39Ch8pFyHuSX7MWoRV+vtVgGbprKYtknwyX99dafJZepSqEN4RYEJZPVtvS DSRKKg3DB21byNjkIDzcrFapa4CRiVB9X79zpoBEVEdH7GFzqLeiKfMLTrxLF0ZfLhhC unItpc3ylFtjFutcT4qsvDubANL54Y3XFRImgGyY/hUIxFQunxCY5k5PA3BikAZDQgo+ Wwzg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RYAHthnO3FgoSib3N9sCijpSPe0JGsN95UuTRECAx8M=; b=cXmIv+lKpYBM8RtiHhwiAsu2YyJmJTHRL4bI26AaAX0CgtJUMWc7vi7gz9frU3xmcj 2OotMF8sFfqbfzD/rvORM55tcRCEuPxuZhGpTQcL5Y0NBjydxwr/hTkbUSzgAJvoBxZ+ rWxVVTX3e4T1bJg1P70vX0ycxJOlhc4TiPqOnr8e0EYygMt0aeIQul5TqrhvZg7Ny8CO SY5JD6jMAyIl1RSXUKYyqPy7FpQ4iNt8z8gX2bNQmQ57LMqVkjvyflNcLyXYcZmGenKz yC9WcyulFwVCw7ylB2Q7WyExOBVr3EtiHz2Z/BB3tjJaVfQoF9ybhAoq/haWwAI+nt+b oyZw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530M5aCnLTX7EABvo3uOwN9WAx/zpfumNIl0KvduJ1BB++jxgo/C 2kx8JDFNC5H2v7BuZiMjGOT5TPpCDGvyuziJmro=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwnTb1K5067lYZIpLhSo9DR1EJ5aaY+MFMfUGFk5Z5McfN/faKHhxpQ/wd1D4cbWaAj20KMomIQ/CTjf8CW2oQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d082:: with SMTP id h2mr4827370ilh.83.1622486077954; Mon, 31 May 2021 11:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162214803478.23177.107295775009225422@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAF4+nEFcmq0ha1nnY846dNbFa=nOFAUhS_bU0Ohbu2T21JkPag@mail.gmail.com> <F8AEA9DA-C33C-4F55-9C5F-A074C208B679@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <F8AEA9DA-C33C-4F55-9C5F-A074C208B679@vigilsec.com>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 14:34:27 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEEvs_67ixyDFOptJr+M4OQ1fGYga8O4LmfD3qsO7+AyQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: Last Call <last-call@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226@ietf.org, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, stir-chairs@ietf.org, IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/Hxs9dYYq3DLNoVZZqwDxP2xRn3A>
Subject: Re: [stir] Last Call: <draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02.txt> (Enhanced JWT Claim Constraints for STIR Certificates) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 18:34:44 -0000

Hi Russ,

No, I do not think JSON needs expansion but I wouldn't object to it.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 2:22 PM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>
> Sure.  JSON Web Token (JWT).  Do you think that JSON needs expanded too?
>
> Russ
>
>
> > On May 31, 2021, at 1:58 PM, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > How about expanding "JWT" in the abstract and on first use in the body
> > of this document.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Donald
> > ===============================
> > Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
> > 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
> > d3e3e3@gmail.com
> >
> > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 4:41 PM The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> The IESG has received a request from the Secure Telephone Identity Revisited
> >> WG (stir) to consider the following document: - 'Enhanced JWT Claim
> >> Constraints for STIR Certificates'
> >>  <draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02.txt> as Proposed Standard
> >>
> >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
> >> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> >> last-call@ietf.org mailing lists by 2021-06-10. Exceptionally, comments may
> >> be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
> >> of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> >>
> >> Abstract
> >>
> >>
> >>   RFC 8226 provides a certificate extension to constrain the JWT claims
> >>   that can be included in the PASSporT as defined in RFC 8225.  If the
> >>   signer includes a JWT claim outside the constraint boundaries, then
> >>   the recipient will reject the entire PASSporT.  This document defines
> >>   an additional way that the JWT claims can be constrained.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The file can be obtained via
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email