Re: [stir] WG Last Call for RFC4474bis

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 13 July 2016 21:25 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D209912D614 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z1AHfW5F2u8u for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E12512D597 for <stir@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7A93004EF for <stir@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:25:38 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id DP_ePgWsy-46 for <stir@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:25:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-108-51-128-219.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.51.128.219]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06070300429 for <stir@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:25:36 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <C1E751BC-55E9-4D8C-A6A5-B5674835870E@vigilsec.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:24:50 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7CEFB346-DB2B-4130-A636-FB2B6CFD344D@vigilsec.com>
References: <C1E751BC-55E9-4D8C-A6A5-B5674835870E@vigilsec.com>
To: IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/IQcBSJzxWBNEBUjOvdN2S2JyCmE>
Subject: Re: [stir] WG Last Call for RFC4474bis
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 21:25:42 -0000

I think the document should go forward, but please remove the reference to RFC 6919.

Russ


On Jul 13, 2016, at 3:58 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

> 
> The authors of the Authenticated Identity Management in SIP document
> (https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-stir-rfc4474bis-10.txt) have
> stated that the document is mature and ready for WG Last Call.
> 
> This message starts a two week WG Last Call for that document, which
> will end on 27 July 2016.  Ideally major concerns will be raised
> quickly so that they can be tackled during IETF 96.
> 
> Please review the document and send comments on it to the STIR WG
> mail list.  Please clearly state your opinion as to whether the
> document is ready for publication as a standards-track RFC.
> Remember that support for publication is needed.
> 
> Thanks,
> Russ & Robert
> 
> _______________________________________________
> stir mailing list
> stir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir