IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] current draft charter

Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com> Wed, 12 June 2013 21:41 UTC

Return-Path: <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8B121E808A for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:41:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.581
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.581 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ISB3IBA8nGXQ for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E49D21E80F2 for <stir@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r5CLehQ4024495 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 12 Jun 2013 21:40:44 GMT
Received: from userz7022.oracle.com (userz7022.oracle.com [156.151.31.86]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5CLegLi024657 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Jun 2013 21:40:42 GMT
Received: from abhmt113.oracle.com (abhmt113.oracle.com [141.146.116.65]) by userz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5CLefZL012323; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 21:40:41 GMT
Received: from [10.1.21.23] (/10.5.21.23) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:38:57 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <B6D6C44E-3FE3-4342-9BDD-4096D4B66DD7@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:38:55 -0700
From: Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com>
To: Dan York <york@isoc.org>
References: <CDDE44D8.D939%york@isoc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CDDE44D8.D939%york@isoc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]
Cc: "stir@ietf.org" <stir@ietf.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>, Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: [stir] current draft charter
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stir>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 21:41:10 -0000

On Jun 12, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Dan York <york@isoc.org> wrote:

>> But yes, for the telephone model it seems unlikely that casting these as
>> domain names will get us very far.
> 
> ... I think this issue will get in the way right now.  As much as I would
> love to see this as a good example of where DANE can help, I still haven't
> been able to wrap my brain around how we could use DNS for telephone
> numbers without running into all the exact same issues that made public
> ENUM non-deployable.  :-(

That begs the question of what issues you think made Public ENUM fail, and why we won't hit the same issues in whatever model we choose.

-hadriel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email