[stir] Third WG Last Call for RFC4474bis

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 07 October 2016 14:27 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D469C12962A for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 07:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IslTXsG7EmBm for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 07:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F16BA12960F for <stir@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 07:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B75300A3F for <stir@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 10:27:33 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id jU6ioYeKS0MH for <stir@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 10:27:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E96D3002BA for <stir@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 10:27:32 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <C1E751BC-55E9-4D8C-A6A5-B5674835870E@vigilsec.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 10:27:32 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <A8FC2815-6A90-4D10-9688-9C10CA43821F@vigilsec.com>
References: <C1E751BC-55E9-4D8C-A6A5-B5674835870E@vigilsec.com>
To: IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/LWhwZ1dU0tzIN5vmcrh4uDNEIJ8>
Subject: [stir] Third WG Last Call for RFC4474bis
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 14:27:36 -0000

A revised document to address the issues raised in the second WG Last Call
has been posted. (https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-stir-rfc4474bis-13.txt).

This message starts a third WG Last Call for this document, but unlike the
two earlier WG Last Calls, this one will be for one week.  It ends on
14 October 2016.

Please review the document and send comments on it to the STIR WG mail
list.  Please clearly state your opinion as to whether the document is
ready for publication as a standards-track RFC.  Remember that support
for publication is needed, so if you think the document is ready to go
forward, please say so.

Thanks,
Russ & Robert