Re: [stir] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-stir-rph-emergency-services-02

"DOLLY, MARTIN C" <md3135@att.com> Thu, 06 August 2020 12:47 UTC

Return-Path: <md3135@att.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1653A0B9E for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 05:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9xy69TaBcZ7W for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 05:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95B713A0BA0 for <stir@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 05:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0048589.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0048589.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 076CgZAj015466; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 08:47:46 -0400
Received: from alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp6.sbc.com [144.160.229.23]) by m0048589.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 32rfm5a326-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 06 Aug 2020 08:47:46 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 076CliYE017442; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 08:47:45 -0400
Received: from zlp30486.vci.att.com (zlp30486.vci.att.com [135.47.91.177]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 076Clepl017333 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 6 Aug 2020 08:47:41 -0400
Received: from zlp30486.vci.att.com (zlp30486.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp30486.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id D32AE4009E6C; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:47:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from GAALPA1MSGEX1BB.ITServices.sbc.com (unknown [135.50.89.103]) by zlp30486.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTPS id B5D154009E6B; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:47:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from GAALPA1MSGEX1BE.ITServices.sbc.com (135.50.89.106) by GAALPA1MSGEX1BB.ITServices.sbc.com (135.50.89.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2044.4; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 08:47:39 -0400
Received: from GAALPA1MSGEX1BE.ITServices.sbc.com ([135.50.89.106]) by GAALPA1MSGEX1BE.ITServices.sbc.com ([135.50.89.106]) with mapi id 15.01.2044.004; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 08:47:39 -0400
From: "DOLLY, MARTIN C" <md3135@att.com>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [stir] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-stir-rph-emergency-services-02
Thread-Index: AQHWZ09yMxJg9WUBj0CEEJMLuBtdw6kq28qAgAA1C5A=
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:47:38 +0000
Message-ID: <368b707bae3847aaa83f16ad17b88d3a@att.com>
References: <8372C576-08B7-41C4-B021-38622BABAD25@vigilsec.com> <919FC584-18AF-4419-B174-B9FB37B6439D@vigilsec.com> <1CFC4EFA-1B05-4278-95EB-B9099328F1E7@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <1CFC4EFA-1B05-4278-95EB-B9099328F1E7@sn3rd.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.70.177.14]
x-tm-snts-smtp: ACCFF10A467C56BA0249AAE705E3F8D0A13C5DF1DD7D903E9B4EC15D712B2B3B2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-06_06:2020-08-06, 2020-08-06 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008060091
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/OTDa_9DtICRNF3sTRO_wKK8EyUE>
Subject: Re: [stir] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-stir-rph-emergency-services-02
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 12:47:51 -0000

I support as well

-----Original Message-----
From: stir <stir-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Sean Turner
Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 1:38 AM
To: IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [stir] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-stir-rph-emergency-services-02

Hi!

Support moving this one along, and I think these are all minor.

0) I thought the security considerations was missing something about compromise leading to misuse of network resources, but it’s the 2nd paragraph of s1. That shows you which section I read first ;) Might be worth repeating that s1 blurb in s8 or at least referring to it from s8? Maybe:

  The security consideration enumerated in
  Section 1 and the security considerations discussed
  in [RFC8224], Section 12, are applicable.

1) I hit the nits button (also out of habit) there are a lot unused references and they can be deleted:

== Unused Reference: 'RFC3261' is defined on line 275, but no explicit
   reference was found in the text

== Unused Reference: 'RFC8226' is defined on line 305, but no explicit
   reference was found in the text

== Unused Reference: 'RFC7340' is defined on line 322, but no explicit
   reference was found in the text

== Unused Reference: 'RFC7375' is defined on line 327, but no explicit
   reference was found in the text

== Unused Reference: 'RFC8126' is defined on line 331, but no explicit
   reference was found in the text

2) Do the examples in s3.1, 3.2, and s4 match the order required in s5? I.e., shouldn’t the examples be as follow to be in lexicographic order:

s3.1:
{
 "dest":{["uri":"urn:service:sos"]},
 "iat":1443208345,
 "orig":{"tn":"12155551212"},
 "rph":{"ESorig":["esnet,x"]}
}

s3.2:
{
 "dest":{["tn":"12155551212"]},
 "iat":1443208345,
 "orig":{"tn":"12155551213"},
 "rph":{"EScallback":["esnet,x"]}
}

s4:
{
 "dest":{["tn":"12155551212"]},
 "iat":1443208345,
 "orig":{"tn":"12155551213"},
 "rph":{"EScallback":["esnet,x"]},
 "sph":"psap-callback"
}

3) In s3.2, there’s a reference to "r-values”. What’s that?

4) Should this “should only” be a SHOULD:

 The value of the "sph" claim key SHOULD be "psap-callback”
 to match the SIP Priority header field value for authorized  emergency services callbacks.

4) In s5, s/order,/order:

5) In s6, should the compact form for ‘rph’ PASSPORTS be NOT RECOMMENDED, i.e.,

OLD:

  The use of the compact form of PASSporT is not specified in this
  document or recommended for 'rph' PASSporTs.

NEW:

  The use of the compact form of PASSporT is not specified in this
  document and it is NOT RECOMMENDED for 'rph' PASSporTs.

6) 2119 and 8174 should be normative references.

Cheers,

spt

> On Jul 31, 2020, at 11:29, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> This is the STIR WG Last Call for "Assertion Values for a Resource Priority Header Claim and a SIP Priority Header Claim in Support of Emergency Services Networks” <draft-ietf-stir-rph-emergency-services-02>.  Please review the document and send your comments to the STIR WG mail list by 22 August 2020.
> 
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.
> org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dstir-2Drph-2Demergency-2Dservices_&d=DwIGaQ&c=L
> FYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=G9v8uCSSQhCmpw7ItG0r2g&m=rc3BKD0F1A86-CRpYcNpr
> 3ms70HuQtKNY4CHDOwLFi4&s=wrhfFB0s-E4uOkriBv9h6dXa72267K1J1fyz_BiBkNQ&e
> =
> 
> Thanks,
> Robert & Russ
> 
> _______________________________________________
> stir mailing list
> stir@ietf.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mail
> man_listinfo_stir&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=G9v8uCSSQhCmpw7I
> tG0r2g&m=rc3BKD0F1A86-CRpYcNpr3ms70HuQtKNY4CHDOwLFi4&s=ZKKsr6tspW-kbfj
> ncoP6hDzO5sgTK73kzp7v8GrK9z0&e=

_______________________________________________
stir mailing list
stir@ietf.org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_stir&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=G9v8uCSSQhCmpw7ItG0r2g&m=rc3BKD0F1A86-CRpYcNpr3ms70HuQtKNY4CHDOwLFi4&s=ZKKsr6tspW-kbfjncoP6hDzO5sgTK73kzp7v8GrK9z0&e=