[stir] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-stir-rfc4474bis-15: (with COMMENT)

["Mirja Kuehlewind" <[e-mail]>]

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-stir-rfc4474bis-15: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-rfc4474bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

One minor comment:
Not sure how the solution with "ppt" field came up for extensibility.
Wouldn't it make sense to have a version field instead that always has to
be presented (or if not present is assumed to be 0); just to reduce
implementation complexity. Or am I missing something? Just wondering...
btw. what does 'ppt' stand for?

(Added later)

Now I have read draft-ietf-stir-passport. So it clear why this method is
used. Didn't realize that the following sentence means 'please check
PASSporT for further questions...': "this specification specifies an
optional "ppt" parameter of the Identity header field, which mirrors the
"ppt" header in PASSporT." Maybe just give a more specific reference
including the section refernce.