Re: [stir] WGLC: draft-ietf-stir-messaging-02

I have finally looked at this document and have only a few comments:
1.  Section 3.1 seems to indicated that messaging over RFC4103 is different from messaging defined in 5194.  5194 uses 4103, so there is no difference.  You can cite either.  I’d probably cite 4103.  The important point is that it is signaled by INVITE, and thus existing STIR works.

2. Would it be helpful to better describe how emergency services use MESSAGE?  It’s used to signal a non interactive call, for example, an alarm, which does not have any two way interactive media but has data crucial for emergency services to get.  There is no durable session: we use pager mode MESSAGE to get the data. Emergency services use MSRP also, but that is covered by STIR on INVITE.

Brian

> On Apr 24, 2022, at 7:53 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This is a 2-week STIR working group last call of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-messaging <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-messaging> .
> 
> Please send feedback to the authors and the mail list by Monday, 9 May by the end-of-business wherever you are. All feedback is welcome, including feedback of the form of “I read this and it is ready to progress.”
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Ben (For the STIR chairs).
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> stir mailing list
> stir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir