IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] AD Review: draft-ietf-stir-rph-02 - authority to assert the callers identity assumed?

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 13 March 2018 12:09 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A748812D890 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 05:09:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eqvL_YCeRSdF for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 05:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32B9012711B for <stir@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 05:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F343005AB for <stir@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 08:09:10 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 18gNDH27eu4v for <stir@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 08:09:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [172.20.6.66] (unknown [5.148.123.140]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D930A300558; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 08:09:08 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <3337859f-24db-d02c-dd4c-6c00fd9effc1@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 08:09:08 -0400
Cc: IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <974CE676-3C1D-4390-A614-F4CE219770CE@vigilsec.com>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B6C135F8E@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se> <CAFb8J8pa9_q-pQbDy7ACg-JnFurOCJALYUdBzD6C-P1rJHO52g@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B6C153849@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se> <0981B4BB-98C6-4DBB-8E13-A702944ACC3E@gmail.com> <E42CCDDA6722744CB241677169E8365668A592A9@MISOUT7MSGUSRDB.ITServices.sbc.com> <C1A3E161FB009440ABA575570A60CD9C9A5FED72@rrc-ats-exmb2.ats.atsinnovate.com> <D3F011C9-7E23-4BBF-8D9F-E7C2776A4317@ericsson.com> <VI1PR0701MB2304239864FCD877776690D8C7FE0@VI1PR0701MB2304.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <E42CCDDA6722744CB241677169E8365668A5B136@MISOUT7MSGUSRDB.ITServices.sbc.com> <60DBC9ED-9ECD-45D6-AE8C-A8259630BE3B@vigilsec.com> <3337859f-24db-d02c-dd4c-6c00fd9effc1@nostrum.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/TOGnXpyabLBL1f_5FbCVi292cqc>
Subject: Re: [stir] AD Review: draft-ietf-stir-rph-02 - authority to assert the callers identity assumed?
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:09:14 -0000

Thanks.  I guess I missed the comment in the tracker.  Not that you say it again, I recall reading that before ...

Russ


> On Mar 12, 2018, at 5:04 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> On 3/9/18 3:02 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
>> Revision -03 was posted on Feb. 1st.  Can you tell us whether yout comments have been addresses with this revision?
> 
> The document is ready. I indicated in the tracker: "Given the excessive number of documents currently in last call, I'm going to wait last call on this document until after London, to give the last-call queue some time to drain." I thought these comments were automatically sent by the tools to the working group mailing list, but apparently they aren't. Sorry for the confusion.
> 
> /a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email