Re: [stir] URN SOS

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Sun, 22 December 2019 21:14 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232BB12006D for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 13:14:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8hXeCxuBXeEd for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 13:14:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2855120033 for <stir@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 13:14:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB7E300B2F for <stir@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 16:14:41 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id AMzK-_U6o5x0 for <stir@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 16:14:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-108-51-198-163.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.51.198.163]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6129300A1D; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 16:14:39 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <00593B03-11CE-4364-97AF-79B53881FCF6@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_970FF8B4-603F-4979-8089-72CAD39BF178"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2019 16:14:40 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgQdow3HsWe-EH-UQU-5bwegyjxsEA+DLRp6TcyrZtLLLg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
References: <EF51940D-F3B7-4F4E-9AA4-CFE76B75194D@vigilsec.com> <CAL02cgQdow3HsWe-EH-UQU-5bwegyjxsEA+DLRp6TcyrZtLLLg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/XKpIEht5-c0q4H-PXORuBg57ZHE>
Subject: Re: [stir] URN SOS
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2019 21:14:45 -0000

Richard:

It seems to meet the need that was raised in the discussion.  Others can comment if I missed some important context.

Russ


> On Dec 22, 2019, at 3:38 PM, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> wrote:
> 
> Not sure if this is what you’re thinking of, or if this has already been mentioned, but: urn:service:sos exists. 
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5031 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5031>
> 
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 17:26 Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com <mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>> wrote:
> At the session at IETF 106, there was a suggestion that a URN SOS be defined.  I am sending this note to start a discussion on that topic.
> 
> Russ
> _______________________________________________
> stir mailing list
> stir@ietf.org <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>
> _______________________________________________
> stir mailing list
> stir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir