IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] PASSporT question

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Tue, 28 April 2020 22:08 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5E2A3A0A54 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v6T1L06z919C for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62a.google.com (mail-pl1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23BD33A0AAF for <stir@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id f8so40044plt.2 for <stir@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=TnSivjVu/udHh6nh65xPI9Sk61F21IDn4Vpyu4fT8XA=; b=WDuCelYETnXcy8vEfxxHt4/F8GC/Izeh4TEpVPXEP6y1leV/MhMOGBp1JSE5lVqW/A q61I/4FdE9USiVaB8ft2uEqZD1n7sLs/R+2NllVXR0z19LVZijq690g0+NZ6ZBjc+kJB JP4d4JQNP9C/UqDDimYBq2tReJIcb8lFMBZsbC4rQQkEH74WO9fA52euamJQAZxxOhYN iCuCDXwg3sa0X5s0m+e3pSQ2RdXFU8FZRFPMDOTGpd6miATsz48dZrURXjxSAf84JPcM yefeGAkrhB5YzZXAutqEnDV88WzCiynLQiHdwrGJcAx7KgtFxtcjaxn6gFOWf9PSfmjd RiNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=TnSivjVu/udHh6nh65xPI9Sk61F21IDn4Vpyu4fT8XA=; b=CYCeJD9UITMKtXfVHLoNTNC4NeMAHv9IBZBi2xiJpKjxK7wZFOT0S9kFlzxqg4S9Gx N7ucXRsEprFvMKtqAMcbHwa5VB7PmmycxxSLghdd0CO4J9IYzN4TRmKsssCGpQXEHNI8 MvbwqXrKGfmB0ePvaZ/wm9odFpEEm8CFNjgUPOqa4fcZj6FfmA6IHrvAtfRGwUWUsN6F DwyaoTXJtz6KK3bS6sde2z+4rOCmojiH6TOq0SyWxX6dYbDW4+rVrKj8buMPPjuALDVb UjTjtNkEQ8eraZnZ3qNYKBy/U5DhhWgd6vDgmUIUxRJVP51BtFL7Y9RwjmM16bAD4gH9 7B+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubwOcK2HffJzmyXelVVIZN0tMaEbDvTemq4FntaX70jqNoJ++kJ JrY4LTQ2fD185m2kqLUEmHJaqgndRwxkaQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ1cNjDGHU6tOkWdAOsqlG417GL5W2Cs/TM7bYxxKo6jGI4KnUVz+wv+nr83TQfwQcAFlf5Iw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:23e2:: with SMTP id g89mr7766463pje.105.1588111735017; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mike-mac.lan ([170.75.128.30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f30sm3060608pje.29.2020.04.28.15.08.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
To: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
Cc: "stir@ietf.org Mail List" <stir@ietf.org>
References: <62e762b6-4a1e-7d16-ced3-09ae785a30cc@mtcc.com> <CAHBDyN7FbJVy=epJR_D9eCOXLvKm85ZLwDVg8MSk=hiB8yumEg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <4151ce21-4f64-4234-c7a7-1b1f974c6ea1@mtcc.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:08:58 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHBDyN7FbJVy=epJR_D9eCOXLvKm85ZLwDVg8MSk=hiB8yumEg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------EFA901BAE04B7653044331CE"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/YNyeDinYesI3oAF0YLFtONNb4us>
Subject: Re: [stir] PASSporT question
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 22:08:59 -0000

On 4/28/20 1:47 PM, Mary Barnes wrote:
> It's important for the acronym (only half joking).
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 1:44 PM Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com 
> <mailto:mike@mtcc.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     Reading the introduction and abstract it repeatedly mentions
>     "personal"
>     and "persona". Is it actually relevant? I mean, I can be sitting
>     together with a dozen other people on camera and this would all
>     still be
>     relevant, right? Also: a SIP camera watching my front porch would not
>     necessarily have a person involved at all if it decided to call me
>     because of porch pirate.
>

I'm all for acronym fun -- I came up with the contorted KINK acronym, 
after all -- but there is actual a concern which I raised in another 
piece of mail here which make me worried about giving the impression 
that the receiver can believe guarantees about the originating user part 
being the owner of that user part. This just adds to my unease.

Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email