IETF Logo Mail Archive

[stir] stir-06: Reality check on numbers (6.1.1)

Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com> Fri, 11 December 2015 07:08 UTC

Return-Path: <eburger@standardstrack.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0AE31A889F for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 23:08:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.688
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.688 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ELMNPLftW3lL for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 23:08:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from biz104.inmotionhosting.com (biz104.inmotionhosting.com [173.247.247.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF8171A8855 for <stir@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 23:08:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=standardstrack.com; s=default; h=Mime-Version:To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Content-Type:From; bh=FanTVCRNfpcUFlNArPLJiUjjm99FUGfefFzJ4Q9WgzE=; b=karAVHDdnjIk1utYo5w2NLGLFF02ZKEjhxl/vAdrzBEBrU3CQyThlwZzIqj7v5E9f01Qx9gkYJTeB+ZtsBT4pEdRekeQ7Y9Q2DYuy8vyIi8e789c6PzcrVO7zhSwvUpazauD9PpUZu0aDdrmQaPdI5vpgGCU26fVGSqH0ffl+LI=;
Received: from ip68-100-196-239.dc.dc.cox.net ([68.100.196.239]:53943 helo=[192.168.15.111]) by biz104.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from <eburger@standardstrack.com>) id 1a7DH4-0007Tf-6O for stir@ietf.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 18:17:38 -0800
From: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6DE9035F-25E7-4695-A388-C28EFBA38510"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:15:58 -0500
Message-Id: <9C95CF4B-88BD-4EFF-9076-E59CF165E22D@standardstrack.com>
To: stir@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz104.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - standardstrack.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz104.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: eburger+standardstrack.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/YW2KgnxHLXOHdEjYT8XccOzsqsE>
Subject: [stir] stir-06: Reality check on numbers (6.1.1)
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 07:08:36 -0000

Section 6.1.1 on Canonicalization states:
      Once an implementation has identified a telephone number, it must
      construct a number string.  Implementations MUST drop any leading
      +'s, any internal dashes, parentheses or other non-numeric
      characters, excepting only the leading "#" or "*" keys used in
      some special service numbers (typically, these will appear only in
      the To header field value).  This MUST result in an ASCII string
      limited to "#", "*" and digits without whitespace or visual
      separators.

Survey time: does pound or star  EVER appear in a From field? E.164 does not allow it.

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status