IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] current draft charter

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Wed, 12 June 2013 21:42 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89B721E80ED for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qx3HkwBse4oU for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E0321E8094 for <stir@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.9.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5CLgIXC018782 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <stir@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:42:21 -0700
Message-ID: <51B8EB34.9030803@bbiw.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:42:12 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "stir@ietf.org" <stir@ietf.org>
References: <CDDE44D8.D939%york@isoc.org> <B6D6C44E-3FE3-4342-9BDD-4096D4B66DD7@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <B6D6C44E-3FE3-4342-9BDD-4096D4B66DD7@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.67]); Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [stir] current draft charter
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stir>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 21:42:30 -0000

On 6/12/2013 2:38 PM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
> On Jun 12, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Dan York <york@isoc.org> wrote:
>> ... I think this issue will get in the way right now.  As much as I would
>> love to see this as a good example of where DANE can help, I still haven't
>> been able to wrap my brain around how we could use DNS for telephone
>> numbers without running into all the exact same issues that made public
>> ENUM non-deployable.  :-(
>
> That begs the question of what issues you think made Public ENUM fail, and why we won't hit the same issues in whatever model we choose.


+1


d/


-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email