IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] certificates: short-lived or status

Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com> Thu, 16 March 2017 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@yaanatech.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B956C1294F8 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MLqm4ZrTWV-N for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mil-admin1.yaanatech.net (38-110-174-3-static.dzbja.com [38.110.174.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18BD1294B3 for <stir@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from extmail1.yaanatech.com (12-12-158-76-static.dzbja.com [12.12.158.76]) by mil-admin1.yaanatech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C918077B; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:02:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.51] (pool-70-106-242-209.clppva.fios.verizon.net [70.106.242.209]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by extmail1.yaanatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8358B58090; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:02:57 +0000 (UTC)
Reply-To: tony@yaanatech.com
References: <06463D70-4B38-48A0-A653-1CBF7EC70292@att.com> <eb8ece83-e982-4d6a-ab61-4f5124cf420d@email.android.com> <E21A8D8F-88F7-474E-A263-8C38F5D671A7@shockey.us>
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>, "DOLLY, MARTIN C" <md3135@att.com>
Cc: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, stir@ietf.org, "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
From: Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com>
Organization: Yaana Technologies
Message-ID: <b30a12ca-04ac-3f97-1454-dd9a6919281a@yaanatech.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:02:56 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E21A8D8F-88F7-474E-A263-8C38F5D671A7@shockey.us>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------9399FD167896FA947F36E554"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/ZX_nXX0qqD8JTK7spoZ209I-c2k>
Subject: Re: [stir] certificates: short-lived or status
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:03:00 -0000

No Rich, there are few protocols in this
sector that are specified by the FCC, and
it is delusional to think that they are going
to stick yours in 47 CFR. (That's where the
regulations exist.)  If you read the proposed
rules, they only deal with providing authority
for regulated carriers to block.

Maybe you can get Trump to write an Executive
Order for you and we can move to "alt" land. :-)

--tony


On 2017-03-16 10:51 AM, Richard Shockey wrote:
>
> We haven’t seen the final Report and Order yet. ☺  Stay tuned.
>
> Yes Virginia there really are protocol police.  See 47 U.S.C Title II  
> ( as frequently amended)
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email