Re: [stir] Brief review of draft-ietf-stir-rfc4474bis-08
Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com> Fri, 06 May 2016 14:27 UTC
Return-Path: <eburger@standardstrack.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3503C12D609 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 May 2016 07:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.012
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=standardstrack.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id grrWP14-59mr for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 May 2016 07:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from biz104.inmotionhosting.com (biz104.inmotionhosting.com [173.247.247.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1CCA12D600 for <stir@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 May 2016 07:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=standardstrack.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type; bh=AwVQC7Z+Eo+8IgO3ZkoEn2wPcGcQYUbbqNIHTiAARr4=; b=N8j6aNN+j8pJqIIq9H332lbjB9 oHjbKeA/Q2qzxY+/IVWlWT2dE6fFjrbJm6bC8S7JieXOkymfpTEsBmIzRZRIQtOs4QEjZAKCXsquw 9f5U2pPhMK9AbZaXAwlxVktOSWkI0v8btbZ3EVf27VBX6iZ3kgm5BGgDX5P0/gOfO//M=;
Received: from [141.161.133.176] (port=39939 helo=[10.129.225.145]) by biz104.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86_1) (envelope-from <eburger@standardstrack.com>) id 1aygj3-0008Sr-8g for stir@ietf.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 07:27:30 -0700
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D77025E5-83CE-40F3-A67F-35FDD3AC1B22"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2
From: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
In-Reply-To: <E5B79032-3EA5-4628-BB3F-8A02C8B90856@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 10:27:28 -0400
Message-Id: <352435FE-012E-481C-84F4-6D6342D1483B@standardstrack.com>
References: <E5B79032-3EA5-4628-BB3F-8A02C8B90856@gmail.com>
To: IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz104.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - standardstrack.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz104.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: eburger+standardstrack.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Authenticated-Sender: biz104.inmotionhosting.com: eburger@standardstrack.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/abmUzTj3PCbcPdOn2i3_ylaWfhs>
Subject: Re: [stir] Brief review of draft-ietf-stir-rfc4474bis-08
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 14:27:32 -0000
Typically sits, but does not always sit. That was a matter for great debate. Clearly we need clearer language. > On Apr 30, 2016, at 4:35 PM, Alan Ford <alan.ford@gmail.com> wrote: > > - Section 4, it took me a while to realise that the authentication service typically sat as a component of Alice's home SIP proxy. Whilst obvious once a bit more context was available, I'd suggest adding a sentence at the end of paragraph 5 (The proxy, ...) that reads something like "The proxy then forwards the request under normal to Bob's domain".
- [stir] Brief review of draft-ietf-stir-rfc4474bis… Alan Ford
- Re: [stir] Brief review of draft-ietf-stir-rfc447… Eric Burger
- Re: [stir] Brief review of draft-ietf-stir-rfc447… Peterson, Jon