[stir] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-stir-cert-delegation-03: (with COMMENT)

Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 09 September 2020 06:01 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-stir-cert-delegation@ietf.org, stir-chairs@ietf.org, stir@ietf.org, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, housley@vigilsec.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <159963130758.14014.7890478426015875835@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 23:01:47 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/aepEMQlKVsRfAUKUmJpZypSZ-EI>
Subject: [stir] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-stir-cert-delegation-03: (with COMMENT)

Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-stir-cert-delegation-03: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-cert-delegation/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[ nits ]]

[ section 1 ]

* s/holder of certificate/holder of a certificate/ perhaps

[ section 4 ]

* s/needs contain/needs to contain/?

[ section 4.1 ]

* How should I read "to deference the "x5u" field"?  Is this
  'dereference'?

[ section 5 ]

* "has a own parent" -> "has its own parent", perhaps

[ section 8.1 ]

* "object with suitable for"?  s/with//?

[stir] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-st… Erik Kline via Datatracker