[stir] STIR and WebRTC
Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Mon, 09 May 2016 20:05 UTC
Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3889C12D0E7 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 May 2016 13:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4KXRAdsFqJPO for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 May 2016 13:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp90.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp90.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1381312D147 for <stir@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 May 2016 13:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp4.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 769A218060C for <stir@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 May 2016 16:04:58 -0400 (EDT)
X-Auth-ID: fluffy@iii.ca
Received: by smtp4.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: fluffy-AT-iii.ca) with ESMTPSA id 27A131805BD for <stir@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 May 2016 16:04:57 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender-Id: fluffy@iii.ca
Received: from [192.168.4.100] ([UNAVAILABLE]. [128.107.241.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:465 (trex/5.5.4); Mon, 09 May 2016 16:04:58 -0400
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BE2D83A8-B2AD-4A51-8638-CA9F1F7F0B1A@iii.ca>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 14:04:59 -0600
To: stir@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/bp8eZDIaemWo-tGyxcCpxBkPk0Q>
Subject: [stir] STIR and WebRTC
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 20:05:01 -0000
I've been looking at how WebRTC Identity and STIR work together and put together a worked out example at http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-jennings-stir-rtcweb-identity-00.txt It does not propose any significant changes to STIR content but it does point at a few syntax changes that might make things easier. One is to include the type of identity assertion in the SDP a=identity as extra parameters so they would look like a=identity:eyJhc3NlNzcG9ydHYxIn19;protocol=passport Another could be to get WebRTC and STIR to use a common syntax to represent the DTLS-SRTP fingerprint. Love to get feedback if people see any problems with these types of changes to STIR. Thanks, Cullen
- [stir] STIR and WebRTC Cullen Jennings