Re: [stir] I-D Action: draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-05.txt

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 26 July 2021 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E2F3A1867 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 08:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gVHUgr5mq7dH for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 08:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BE9B3A1861 for <stir@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 08:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E525F300B06 for <stir@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 11:04:23 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ZTvevhCAN6Mt for <stir@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 11:04:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A37DD300AEC for <stir@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 11:04:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 11:04:21 -0400
References: <162731158247.26908.1516707460496490682@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <162731158247.26908.1516707460496490682@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-Id: <8366256E-D8D2-4186-92F8-0AFEA92593C7@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/e_T4RD_PCnMqbnsipGAdRPq3yvQ>
Subject: Re: [stir] I-D Action: draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-05.txt
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 15:04:26 -0000

IANA made the code point assignment, so the example and the ASN.1 module were updated accordingly.

Russ

> On Jul 26, 2021, at 10:59 AM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Secure Telephone Identity Revisited WG of the IETF.
> 
>        Title           : Enhanced JWT Claim Constraints for STIR Certificates
>        Author          : Russ Housley
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-05.txt
> 	Pages           : 11
> 	Date            : 2021-07-26
> 
> Abstract:
>   RFC 8226 specifies the use of certificates for Secure Telephone
>   Identity Credentials, and these certificates are often called "STIR
>   Certificates".  RFC 8226 provides a certificate extension to
>   constrain the JSON Web Token (JWT) claims that can be included in the
>   Personal Assertion Token (PASSporT) as defined in RFC 8225.  If the
>   PASSporT signer includes a JWT claim outside the constraint
>   boundaries, then the PASSporT recipient will reject the entire
>   PASSporT.  This document updates RFC 8226; it provides all of the
>   capabilities available in the original certificate extension as well
>   as an additional way to constrain the allowable JWT claims.  The
>   enhanced extension can also provide a list of claims that are not
>   allowed to be included in the PASSporT.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226/
> 
> There is also an htmlized version available at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-05
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-05