Re: [stir] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-stir-rfc4474bis-15: (with DISCUSS)
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 03 November 2016 13:24 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246451295ED; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 06:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LrUtKNe5oz9A; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 06:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2AA61295DB; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 06:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF7CBE5F; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 13:23:59 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cDG5XMiVmC6p; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 13:23:59 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [134.226.36.93] (bilbo.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.93]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 98F1BBE2E; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 13:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1478179439; bh=svSuTVnVJKG9ER9gTCjON7U3C4POIax/uc6gqyjJzmc=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=pvel0Tw81/bG/UT8xqyx96ymB6nBYkod0LO5BwtAx0uaTW31yO35FEPG7OMH4tMxa BcWzukHNV8Nju+krs/F2uCspeFFRE4ORAf4RTFmVtQ7pTG5r0OZIbmV0gVGZKecQKu ZI4sSUsPxUZe1vgJAtem/ItVSswbIiSyZeogfkBU=
To: "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <147813752132.24106.5602048445726889072.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D440B031.1C1F85%jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <158e812d-af49-842e-680d-b6b8cf181be5@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 13:23:58 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D440B031.1C1F85%jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms010302050204040608070103"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/iHPZrdX3hnriCdHN4O22rLiFyoc>
Cc: "stir@ietf.org" <stir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-stir-rfc4474bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-stir-rfc4474bis@ietf.org>, "stir-chairs@ietf.org" <stir-chairs@ietf.org>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Subject: Re: [stir] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-stir-rfc4474bis-15: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 13:24:24 -0000
On 03/11/16 13:20, Peterson, Jon wrote: > Now that much said, out of an abundance of caution for future use cases we > can't anticipate, we could tweak the cert syntax to permit those > characters, but that would end up being a stir-certs fix rather than a > rfc4474bis fix. Fair enough, and that'd be fine by me. Or, you could say somewhere that when matching the values one drops the stuff including and after any * or # maybe? S.
- [stir] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-st… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [stir] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-iet… Peterson, Jon
- Re: [stir] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-iet… Stephen Farrell