Re: [stir] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Thu, 27 May 2021 17:19 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE37F3A0B8A; Thu, 27 May 2021 10:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.281
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.281 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.398, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8HDR-WwrpYIQ; Thu, 27 May 2021 10:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B23093A0B85; Thu, 27 May 2021 10:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.9.176]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 14RHJSTT093445 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 27 May 2021 12:19:29 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1622135969; bh=oVAUc8cDn+Ell23IqgCC7SZ+j4IVoBop4Wlevp5eJSk=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=hRLBkRvqPf8109DcbsqChM5gP6YP4ITZHI3Nx6A4u0grXMuCGCSaCyRUPTEkaO5nl EVf72prLGFqsa689DUMRjo/Ly9u+tBxR57o99Q9TguJc5kZigIAMP/27XOj8vhxWCl PzYVOqh6ggmvZV4nK/VOiulI9wi4HMbimxTlTEsM=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.9.176] claimed to be unformal.localdomain
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>, stir-chairs@ietf.org, IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
References: <162197342464.31097.13986576482232251508@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwYvxUQTcCFVKVAS=_HsWrPiUWf=hvsfc4Jo+NYp5wTsAg@mail.gmail.com> <883FF8CA-3B57-4A09-8C3B-193BC2B83CD7@nostrum.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <14125195-54b0-21e1-e216-ad81173d3fee@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 12:19:23 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <883FF8CA-3B57-4A09-8C3B-193BC2B83CD7@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------2B699CE47DB46D82039600A8"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/jRgS5RX1JUfMVUW49p37phhtWDk>
Subject: Re: [stir] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 17:19:36 -0000

Note how claims are discussed in RFC7519.

RjS

On 5/27/21 12:12 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
> (dons shepherd hat)
>
> The current quote usage seems to follow the convention of RFC 8226. 
> One could argue about whether 8226 did it right, but it is what it is.
>
> (I’d argue that “orig” refers to a human-readable-text JWT claim, thus 
> the quotes, while mustInclude refers to an X.509 extension encoded in 
> ASN.1. But that would be just making up stuff.)
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ben.
>
>
>> On May 27, 2021, at 11:11 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy 
>> <superuser@gmail.com <mailto:superuser@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> A brief AD review; I'm going to Last Call this now as my feedback is 
>> minor, so please just factor this in as Last Call feedback:
>>
>> In Section 3 (and later), stuff like mustInclude and permittedValues 
>> aren't quoted, but smaller things like "iat", "orig", and "dest" 
>> are.  More generally I found the use or non-use of quotes felt 
>> inconsistent.  I don't have a preferred solution, just something to 
>> consider.  I don't know what, if anything, the RFC Editor might do if 
>> they observe the same.
>>
>> -MSK
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 1:10 PM Robert Sparks via Datatracker 
>> <noreply@ietf.org <mailto:noreply@ietf.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     Robert Sparks has requested publication of
>>     draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02 as Proposed Standard on behalf
>>     of the STIR working group.
>>
>>     Please verify the document's state at
>>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226/
>>     <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226/>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> stir mailing list
>> stir@ietf.org <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> stir mailing list
> stir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir