Return-Path: X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF05112D0DA for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 09:20:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.701 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WvKRQ8Qc-ZZ2 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 09:20:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qk0-x232.google.com (mail-qk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CDE312D6CB for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 09:20:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id r184so6917988qkc.1 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 09:20:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ZbyHy4mPnH94ArLXpUvtpcwIdToAimecIikXGTXXIjU=; b=ftiflNl9AcWbiVIAZMQOTP5f/YRH72PYnywF5d3Hpz+98gzKEOAkuoZMSj+dq5O5Bd h7H+VJG5ArbCR/S6nGg+uyrK43snanOPQwUXpIrFpAdh1QUUdwbtwJMcPkFrhOyJvHul ggf+B1D2ARhnU1JDM+1vkJROotDc2zXc2RdzM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ZbyHy4mPnH94ArLXpUvtpcwIdToAimecIikXGTXXIjU=; b=mvfSg0ffYsJmm4jrDo5j1t9gYWBn87KP8LvONRBQIU0Yozrq9KrasjdqlHMDr6nzAp XTNx/6pNuVLRuU1poOreKFanr+2nfvuw1RPMBwQSX9HNrsaUxj42PTDtViMgmJpih33v dkcsf8q6I5NwQDO1xx2bgpd1kJg7e09qAB4T9gbGhUOp3sm0Il0JGof6aQ88epGkjCGJ NtqyrCUBBr755CkXGFLlrFFKqAb30nWswsBu0Cb8zz70P88pgN1fhGqf+Pwho4R+sLZN H8Bhsmk2PlxddVlllOBld0ieoGY+/USkrLNEJqAuLquyMv8Y7eTkk4MO9DygInRUuYb1 2HVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLS5NyU8sJmsy555FHLdJdc337UneWHV0vLpRd8BHoMJJHvn9fTUbRGLW/XpBsc+w== X-Received: by 10.55.74.75 with SMTP id x72mr41629590qka.100.1459873226705; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 09:20:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:176:a0a7:9d9d:54f6:501? ([2001:67c:370:176:a0a7:9d9d:54f6:501]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 9sm14878028qgl.18.2016.04.05.09.20.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 05 Apr 2016 09:20:26 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) From: Sean Turner In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 13:20:23 -0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: To: John Mattsson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Archived-At: Cc: "stir@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [stir] Choice of STIR signature algorithm X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 16:20:33 -0000 On Apr 05, 2016, at 11:36, John Mattsson wrote: > > I think the right algorithm choice for STIR is ES256 or Ed25519. I agree. spt