[stir] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-stir-messaging-06: (with COMMENT)
Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 30 November 2022 20:59 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: stir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0789FC1524B8; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:59:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-stir-messaging@ietf.org, stir-chairs@ietf.org, stir@ietf.org, ben@nostrum.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 9.1.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <166984196202.52425.6625315227896212679@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:59:22 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/neqFSzF8c0lNUoDFW2LhbWmRj3E>
Subject: [stir] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-stir-messaging-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 20:59:22 -0000
Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-stir-messaging-06: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-messaging/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I support Robert's DISCUSS I found it quite hard to follow exactly what is in scope of this spec in Section 3.2. I gather there are certain modes of MESSAGE method that are in scope and others that aren't, but it would be useful to start 3.2 with a taxonomy of these modes and discuss what is in and out of scope. Considerations for the unsupported use cases are fine, but should be clearly separated out as such.
- [stir] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-s… Martin Duke via Datatracker