Re: [stir] SIPCoin - a new cryptocurrency for stopping robocalls

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Sun, 04 March 2018 00:06 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240AA1201FA for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Mar 2018 16:06:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4tbjZSrIBwka for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Mar 2018 16:06:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38D10127876 for <stir@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Mar 2018 16:06:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Svantevit.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w2406O6U091684 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 3 Mar 2018 18:06:25 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.local
To: Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen@jdrosen.net>, stir@ietf.org
References: <CA+23+fFUEESKoQXtoAwg6ySovUb5-Eiy98_wdukcLKQNOrcn3A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <64ca7065-a73d-ce53-d715-a5569823a3c2@nostrum.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2018 18:06:19 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+23+fFUEESKoQXtoAwg6ySovUb5-Eiy98_wdukcLKQNOrcn3A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------972D2595D7864E339B0CF62F"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/o9VpZ6gnwKM5RQ86ChS7vRQMYWU>
Subject: Re: [stir] SIPCoin - a new cryptocurrency for stopping robocalls
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2018 00:06:29 -0000

One of the issues that has arisen in parallel with cryptocurrencies is a 
recognition of the exorbitant energy (and therefore environmental) costs 
they entail. I think this document probably requires a section 
addressing this aspect of the system, including any ways that it varies 
significantly from traditional cryptocurrencies in this regard.

/a

On 3/2/18 4:45 PM, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
> Cullen and I have just submitted this:
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-rosenberg-stir-sipcoin-00.txt
>
> which is a proposal for a new type of cyryptocurrency dedicated solely 
> to preventing spam on the SIP-based phone network. It is designed to 
> be fast, causing less than one second increases in call setup time. 
> NOn-transferrable to avoid being a tool for fraud and avoid being tied 
> to market whim; backed by public CAs with a new type of centralized 
> ledger validation; trivially verifiable by receivers of calls. Also we 
> suggest a technique for incremental deployment on the PSTN which has 
> incremental benefits and economic benefits for each deployment phase. 
> We've done some analysis on the economics to help motivate the solution.
>
> WHen combined with our previous draft, and some nice whitelisting 
> thrown in as described in here, I think this is a very interested 
> technique to put this robocalling plague to rest.
>
> I'm coming to London and looking forward to discussing.
>
> Comments are, of course, welcome.
>
> -- 
> Jonathan Rosenberg, Ph.D.
> jdrosen@jdrosen.net <mailto:jdrosen@jdrosen.net>
> http://www.jdrosen.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> stir mailing list
> stir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir