Re: [stir] I-D Action: draft-ietf-stir-passport-shaken-02.txt

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 22 August 2018 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2064B130EA8 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 09:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66bNCf1_hfCD for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 09:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32C40130EA5 for <stir@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 09:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49FC3005D4 for <stir@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 12:02:33 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id VsrYR7kvyrPO for <stir@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 12:02:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.100.1.20] (44-0.dc.icann.org [192.0.44.0]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C6593002C6; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 12:02:32 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <B9ED4B68-7DFF-4802-A7EA-4B48CE25772C@chriswendt.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 12:02:32 -0400
Cc: IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E91D3297-FCD7-442B-BEB5-A78357473DFD@vigilsec.com>
References: <152147952053.31056.3563220954085220104@ietfa.amsl.com> <B9ED4B68-7DFF-4802-A7EA-4B48CE25772C@chriswendt.net>
To: Chris Wendt <chris-ietf@chriswendt.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/qxfLQilYlRZs7plZ0frOwOGgU48>
Subject: Re: [stir] I-D Action: draft-ietf-stir-passport-shaken-02.txt
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 16:02:38 -0000

Section 8, Order of Claim Keys, now says:

   The order of the claim keys MUST follow the rules of [RFC8225]
   Section 9 and be in lexixgraphic order.  Therefore, the claim keys
   MUST appear in the PASSporT Payload in the following order,

   o  attest

   o  dest

   o  iat

   o  orig

   o  origid

I assume that other extensions will be specified in the future,  so I am wondering if it would be better to say:

8.  Order of Claim Keys

   The order of the claim keys MUST follow the rules of [RFC8225]
   Section 9; the claim keys MUST appear in lexicographic order.
   Therefore, the claim keys discussed in this document appear in
   the PASSporT Payload in the following order:

   o  attest

   o  dest

   o  iat

   o  orig

   o  origid

Russ


> On Mar 19, 2018, at 1:20 PM, Chris Wendt <chris-ietf@chriswendt.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I have updated the draft with some fixes based on comments from Christer, both editorial and related to ordering comments.
> 
> Summary of changes:
> 
> - addressing Christer’s comments around order of claims adding a brief new section
> - clarified the definition of “customer” in the PASSporT ‘attest’ claim section 4
> - clarified that it is calling party telephone number that is being attested to in same section
> - removed last sentence in section 7, it’s repetitive and not needed.
> 
> I figured i would include these changes and update document for efficiency, but will review these in meeting on Thursday in either case.
> 
> -Chris
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mar 19, 2018, at 5:12 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the Secure Telephone Identity Revisited WG of the IETF.
>> 
>>       Title           : PASSporT SHAKEN Extension (SHAKEN)
>>       Authors         : Chris Wendt
>>                         Mary Barnes
>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-stir-passport-shaken-02.txt
>> 	Pages           : 7
>> 	Date            : 2018-03-19
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>  This document extends PASSporT, which is a token object that conveys
>>  cryptographically-signed information about the participants involved
>>  in communications, to include information defined as part of the
>>  SHAKEN specification from ATIS (Alliance for Telecommunications
>>  Industry Solutions) and the SIP Forum IP-NNI Joint Task Force.  These
>>  extensions provide a level of confidence in the correctness of the
>>  originating identity for a telephone network that has communications
>>  coming from both STIR participating originating communications as
>>  well as communications that does not include STIR information.
>> 
>> 
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-passport-shaken/
>> 
>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-stir-passport-shaken-02
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-stir-passport-shaken-02
>> 
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-stir-passport-shaken-02
>> 
>> 
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>> 
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> stir mailing list
>> stir@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir
> 
> _______________________________________________
> stir mailing list
> stir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir