Re: [stir] Second WG Last Call for ...

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Sun, 25 September 2016 16:06 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72AF612B252 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 09:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I7psYYm_hhy1 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 09:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EB7712B250 for <stir@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 09:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B414300596 for <stir@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 12:06:26 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id vfGIcZzOTd-M for <stir@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 12:06:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-108-51-128-219.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.51.128.219]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6984300547 for <stir@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 12:06:25 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <10F4895C-4103-497A-B1E0-7B6CB617F13C@vigilsec.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 12:06:24 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C61F7FF7-E568-46EF-A565-AC22256F8C70@vigilsec.com>
References: <C1E751BC-55E9-4D8C-A6A5-B5674835870E@vigilsec.com> <10F4895C-4103-497A-B1E0-7B6CB617F13C@vigilsec.com>
To: IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/raaNWDPuzR7twLM6t2Ll67R6edM>
Subject: Re: [stir] Second WG Last Call for ...
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 16:06:28 -0000

The Second WG Last Call has completed for:
   - draft-ietf-stir-rfc4474bis-12, 
   - draft-ietf-stir-certificates-08, and
   - draft-ietf-stir-passport-07.

A significant change was proposed. Many people spoke is support of that change, and no one spoke against it.  This change impacts both draft-ietf-stir-rfc4474bis an draft-ietf-stir-passport.

In addition, many clarifications were suggested that impact all three documents.

Authors, can updates to all three document get posted in the next few days?

Russ