[stir] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-stir-messaging-06: (with COMMENT)

John Scudder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 30 November 2022 16:45 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: John Scudder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-stir-messaging@ietf.org, stir-chairs@ietf.org, stir@ietf.org, ben@nostrum.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Message-ID: <166982674664.26120.1071373389955255914@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 08:45:46 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/s-98Ie_R-jNyuvb7plyfimXIY3g>
Subject: [stir] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-stir-messaging-06: (with COMMENT)

John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-stir-messaging-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-messaging/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Like others I took note of the fact that this document contains an itty-bitty
piece of bonafide specification [*] surrounded by a great deal of lucid,
interesting, but ultimately speculative and inconclusive prose.

Unlike others I'm at peace with that.

[*] Paragraphs two and three of Section 3.2.

[stir] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-… John Scudder via Datatracker